Bulletproof Monk - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Bulletproof Monk Reviews

Page 1 of 132
½ January 1, 2018
Bulletproof Monk is a ridiculous, by-the-numbers action movie with silly dialogues and mediocre action sequences. This movie has aged poorly since it was released, with obvious green screen effects and unconvincing wire work. Movies like Crouching Tiger and Hero uses wire work to make action scenes more stylish as if characters are fighting in the air. In Bulletproof Monk, the wire work made the actors look like they're being manipulated by puppet strings. This is what happens when Hollywood attempts to make a wire-fu movie.

The acting was also mediocre, and even campy at times with the ridiculous and pointless "Funktastic" character. Yes, that's his name. The worst line uttered from his mouth was "Lucky for you, this little bit of crumpet's come begging for some of my funktastic love" after Jaime King's character embraced him from behind, telling him to stop fighting Seann William Scott. Writing partners Ethan Reiff and Cyrus Voris probably thought "funktastic" was the word that "cool kids" used back in 2003.

The action scenes weren't very good either. Not only were there a lot of fast cuts, but the shots were framed too close to the actors so you don't get to see much of the action. Action movies would often do this to hide inferior choreography, but Chow Yun-fat is capable of doing stunts. Why the movie failed to utilize his talent as a martial artist is beyond me.

There's not much to say about this film except it's a very forgettable, by-the-numbers action film. Everything that happens in the second and third act can be predicted well before the act even starts. The villain is a Nazi who acquires telekinesis in the third act, and only uses it once.

The movie has no self awareness at all. In this film, Tibetan monks are tasked to protect the scroll that grants the reader "the power to control the world" from Nazis, who want to use the scroll for genocide and wipe out all the race that they deemed inferior, whatever that race is because there's no mention of Jewish people.

If this was a Hong Kong movie, it would embrace the ridiculousness of the film. But when The Monk (played by Chow Yun-fat) shares his wisdom and philosophy with Seann William Scott, it feels like you're supposed to take the movie seriously. But how do you take the movie seriously when the big question is "Why do hot dogs come in packages of 10, while hot dog buns comes in packages of just eight?"?

Overall, Bulletproof Monk isn't a terrible movie. Chow Yun-fat kicks ass in the film, and looked amazingly cool when he was on top of a car wielding two pistols, but the writing was awful, the action scenes were tame, and the cast lacked chemistry. You're better off watching The Matrix or Crouching Tiger again, and with juvenile humour, Bulletproof Monk is a kung-fu movie for teenagers.
½ July 30, 2017
Fair to say this is a bit random - Combining Asian and American comedy to form what is an alright action thriller. Our lead chinaman has been assigned to guarding a sacred scroll, that would give anyone that read it, immortal power and youthful looks. His main enemy has been after it for a number of years, and having foiled him once, he returns a number of years later to have attempt number 2. Even though he's now frail and wheelchair bound, the crazed madman is still more than enough opposition with his army of family and vigilantes attacking in numbers. Our hero realises he can't protect the document on his own, and also needs a trusty compatriot to whom he can pass responsibility on in a few years time. This is when Seann William Scott arrives in the form of a low life pickpocket - An unlikely source that forms a surprisingly close friendship as each other's fighting skills and mannerisms intrigue one another. Littered with high speed battles, and unrealistic fight sequences, this is quite watchable without being spectacular. It's probably like a cross between Rush a Hour and Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon. I'm not sure that's a good combination as it leaves us with a very unique spectacle. Ok as a one off but unsure it would have the strength to spark a series as the dialogue kind of lacks any real cutting edge. The acting is good but outside of the chases and duels, it tends to fall a bit flat - The Asian actor certainly doesn't have the charisma of Jackie Chan but it's still a credible performance, and a watchable production on the whole.
½ May 16, 2017
Despute the cheesy action and story fighting. and the random acting and influencing off of moves you watched in an old movie theater? I still thought it was a fun ride and an excellent way to keep that genre of movie going!
½ October 18, 2016
It had its charms. At times I wanted to like it, to be able to give it a three stars rating even, but any time I remember any scene with "Mr. Funktastic" I insist on the demotion to 2.5 stars tops.
April 12, 2016
Exciting fight scenes. Old marshal arts classics meat modern day young.
½ April 3, 2016
In my review of Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, I spoke about the ability to enjoy the physical spectacle of a film even if the story isn't able to hold your attention. I said that much of the appeal of martial arts films lay in their physicality and skilful choreography, with many people going to see the likes of Enter the Dragon and The Raid because of how fantastically Bruce Lee or his modern-day equivalents could move.

If you could picture a graph with 'substance' on the vertical axis and 'style' on the horizontal axis, Ang Lee's film would be perched near the top right, possessing plenty of both. Slightly further down you would find the likes of Hero and House of Flying Daggers by Zhang Zimou, which are utterly breathtaking to behold but somewhat thinner in the brain department. Bulletproof Monk belongs below this group of films, having next to nothing between its ears but holding our attention with a pulpy style and plenty of silliness.

One of the first things you can say about Bulletproof Monk is that it is testament to the lasting influence of Indiana Jones. More than 20 years after Raiders of the Lost Ark was released, filmmakers throughout Hollywood were still being influenced by it, borrowing from it, and trying to recapture its magic in their own action sequences. Some films from this period, like Dungeons and Dragons, borrowed from Steven Spielberg in a very candid way, with the maze sequences blatantly ripping off whole scenes from the original trilogy. But in a more general way, the films set the template for light-hearted pulpy adventure stories, just as the James Bond series had created the default style for escapist spy films.

The best section of Bulletproof Monk is the first 20 minutes, which play out like an Indiana Jones film with martial arts. I spoke in my review of The Boys from Brazil about how Nazis have become the go-to bad guys for Hollywood films, and this opening sequence is an excellent demonstration of how this still holds true. As with Raiders of the Lost Ark, the nationality of the soldiers is irrelevant: it's funny to see narrow-minded racist bigots get their arses handed to them whatever their creed or colour. This section is what Big Trouble in Little China always should have been like, and the open air setting also brings out the best in debut director Paul Hunter.

When I reviewed Atlantis: The Lost Empire, I criticised the fact that the plot of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade could be "easily transposed" onto its own, such was the laziness of its writing. Bulletproof Monk isn't in the same league in terms of narrative similarities: its plot does revolve around an ancient McGuffin and fighting Nazis, but the beats of its narrative are more entrenched in the buddy movie genre. Additionally, the film differs from Disney's disaster in the attitude it has towards its audience. While Disney displayed active contempt for the audience's intelligence, the film is as least partially aware of how silly it all is and invites those watching to relax and share in the silliness.

From this perspective, a more accurate (albeit general) comparison would be with Highlander, and again this film comes out pretty well. Both Russell Mulcahy and Paul Hunter come from a background in music videos, and both display this lineage in a way which affects the cinematic quality of their respective films. But while Highlander devotes most of its first hour to falling short in its exploration of potential-laden ideas, this is very clear how pulpy and trashy it is from the outset. The action sequences in the opening segment are nicely paced, and while there are no instantly memorable moves to speak off, we do at least get to see things play out without too many distractions.

Where things start to go awry is later in the film, where the fight scenes are predominately set indoors and there is a lot more talking to be done. Hunter's filmography as a pop video director includes videos by the likes of Snoop Dogg, Notorious B.I.G. and Busta Rhymes; rap and hip hop are genres visually distinguished by fast, flashy cuts and often distracting angles. It is possible to use these techniques in a way which enhances the storytelling - Requiem for a Dream is a very good example - but Hunter lacks Darren Aronofsky's skill with composition and lighting, and the action becomes increasingly hard to follow or invest in.

Outside of the action sequences, there is the small matter of our central pairing of Chow Yun-fat and Seann William Scott. Both were in the peak of their careers at this point, with the former riding a new wave of Western recognition after Crouching Tigerand the latter soaking up the fame (or infamy) generated by the first two American Pie offerings. It's hardly the most original pairing under the sun, riffing far too heavily on The Karate Kid for comfort and with not a shred of memorable dialogue between them. But considering how closely associated he has become with Stifler, Scott is surprisingly decent here, or at the very least isn't so overtly obnoxious that we wish he would just go away.

Once its opening sequence is out of the way, Bulletproof Monk quickly settles down into a by-the-numbers action movie-cum-buddy comedy. In terms of effort expended, it's only a hop, skip and a jump from Cradle 2 the Grave from hereon in, and had you missed the first 20 minutes and caught this on late-night TV, you could be forgiven for not remembering anything about it. None of it is offensively bad or overtly irritating, and moments in the script is vaguely witty as it takes the mickey out of pop-Tao philosophy. But beyond its desire to occasionally poke fun at generic convention, it's nothing to write home about.

This feeling of middle-of-the-road decency is reflected in the cinematography. Stefan Czapsky has had a very interesting career, lensing Tim Burton's Edward Scissorhands, Batman Returns and the terrific Ed Wood, as well as working with acclaimed documentarian Errol Morris (The Thin Blue Line) and oddball Todd Solondz (Fear, Anxiety and Depression). This work, however, is much closer to his work on Child's Play 2: the colours are bland and uninspiring, the compositions are generic and the workmanlike camerawork is ultimately compromised by Hunter's penchant for rapid editing.

Hunter has not made another feature film since this effort, and the explanation for this is more complex than may first appear. He clearly has a number of obvious gaps in his filmmaking lexicon which don't do Bulletproof Monk any favours - he's not great with character development, his visuals are shallow and uninspiring, and his camerawork has no distinctive style. But equally his fate is one of many who are parachuted into Hollywood on the basis that they can shoot quickly and handle big-name talent. The script isn't exactly first-rate, and Hunter deserves some credit for marshalling what could be a total borefest into something which is entertainingly risible.

Because Bulletproof Monk has made clear how silly it is early on, it is entirely possible to overlook its technical shortcomings and just let it wash over you as a perfectly acceptable piece of escapist tosh. Whether it is in on the joke or just trying hard to win us over, there is a fair bit of humour to be found which ultimately sees us through the running time, even if we don't care about the story. As with Highlander and Logan's Run before it, it becomes most enjoyable at the very point where we cannot take it seriously, and while it's not spirited or boisterous enough to be considered a romp, it is a pleasant hour and forty minutes' excursion.

The one further similarity that this film has with Highlander is its anticlimactic final battle. The battle combines the search for the ultimate prize (itself a lift from Raiders) and elderly Nazis getting their comeuppance from The Boys from Brazil - and like the former, the final fight from Bulletproof Monk fails to deliver on anything like a satisfying level. The setting may be more ornately pantomime than Mulcahy managed to deliver, and it is more visually impressive than two elderly hams and their stunt doubles rolling around on the floor. But having built up Strucker to such an extent, having him fall off a building and be electrocuted is both cartoonish (in a Disney way) and disappointingly brief.

Bulletproof Monk is a divertingly silly debut feature which is nothing like as bad as critics at the time made out. Hunter's only film to date has plenty of technical shortcomings which together conspire to make it unmemorable after the first 20 minutes, and the weak script generally leaves its reasonably talented cast with precious little to go on. But there is enough both in its glee-inducing opening and the odd pockets of energy dotted throughout to pass the time and leave something of a smile on your face.
Super Reviewer
½ February 24, 2016
This movie was an all round disappointment from the OTT action stunts that if you're over the age of 10 will just roll your eyes at, The acting was pretty bad, The story has been done so many times we can guess what's going to happen next most of the time, Not even Seann William Scotts charm and humour can save this movie, The ending scenes were ok, But the rest of the film is cringe worthy and very forgetful.
February 14, 2016
Spassoso, ma non eccezionale.
Si può vedere senza controindicazioni particolari, ma non aspettavi un film cult sulle arti marziali.
October 30, 2015
People forget to give themselves over to a movie and just be lost in it for awhile. I think this movie is just a good time.Not everything that makes ot to the theater is award winning.
½ October 16, 2015
Weird movie finds Chow Yun Fat as a monk who is protecting a scroll that gives the reader unimaginable powers of wirework and sometimes gravity defying and telekinesis. This doesn't rank among Chow Yun Fat's better films, as the movie is filled with faux style martial arts, so everyone is flipping and the editing is quick and they are trying to pass off the fact that no one in the film actually knows martial arts. Throw in a plot more cheesy than gas station nachos, and you get a Nazi supervillain, tons of nondescript henchmen, and a very forgettable action flick.
October 14, 2015
Modern leftover NAZIs still seek the ancient alien scroll of superhuman rejuvenation & conquering battle skills that comes to which ever possessor chants the incantation of its magic power.
½ May 16, 2015
It might be clichéd, but Chow delivers in this very entertaining film.
April 23, 2015
surprisingly very good, and watched more than once
½ April 11, 2015
This movie was a complete atrocity.
February 12, 2015
SUMMARY: For sixty years a mysterious monk has been protecting an ancient scroll from a madman. He now must find another protector. He finds it when he runs into Kar who is a pocket picking theif who has potential and only cares for himself. And when Kar saves the monk the two become partners and must save the scroll from the madman Strucker. REVIEW: I had fun watching this movie. The chemistry between Chow Yun-Fat and Seann William Scott was totally there and the mix between action and comedy I thought was a success too. The special effects were totally amazing which made up most of the fight scenes and were totally awesome. This was a really fun and entertaining movie to watch. Martial arts movies like this are to hard to pass up.
February 9, 2015
There is very little to like in here, and I actually like Seann William Scott and Chow Yun Fat. This isn't just silly action, but also lack of any comedy or engaging wit that makes similar pictures somewhat tolerable.
½ September 22, 2014
About as good as you'd expect from SWS, but Y-FC helps improve it a bit. You get what you pay for, decent kung-foo amongst many quick cuts and average CGI.
July 20, 2014
After watching this you have to ask the question "How did Sean William Scott become a star?".
June 25, 2014
I'm not sure the director knows what a martial arts movie is suppose to look like...
½ June 19, 2014
Not the best martial arts film and not the best buddy action film either, but it's still enjoyable enough if you like Yun-Fat Chow and Seann William Scott. Yun-Fat plays an ageless monk protecting a scroll and Scott plays the chosen one. Then there are also bad guys, Nazis actually, trying to get the scroll for their own purposes. I never read the comic this film was based on, but the story has fun pulpy possibilities, but the characters are really not there and the fight scenes are rather pedestrian. Corey Yuen did some additional fight choreography for the film, and there are at time some fight scenes that stand out, but overall it's merely competently done fight scenes. Don't watch this film if you're wanting a martial arts film, but it is worth checking out if you're a Yun-Fat fan. Jaime King and the great Mako also appear in the film.
Page 1 of 132