Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (2018)

TOMATOMETER

Critic Consensus: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald has glimmers of the magic familiar to Harry Potter fans, but the story's spell isn't as strong as earlier installments.

AUDIENCE SCORE


Want to See

Not Interested

Add Rating
My Rating    

Tickets & Showtimes

The movie doesn't seem to be playing near you.

Go back
Enter your location to see showtimes near you.

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Videos

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Photos

Movie Info

At the end of the first film, the powerful Dark wizard Gellert Grindelwald (Depp) was captured by MACUSA (Magical Congress of the United States of America), with the help of Newt Scamander (Redmayne). But, making good on his threat, Grindelwald escaped custody and has set about gathering followers, most unsuspecting of his true agenda: to raise pure-blood wizards up to rule over all non-magical beings. In an effort to thwart Grindelwald's plans, Albus Dumbledore (Law) enlists his former student Newt Scamander, who agrees to help, unaware of the dangers that lie ahead. Lines are drawn as love and loyalty are tested, even among the truest friends and family, in an increasingly divided wizarding world.

Watch it now

Cast

Johnny Depp
as Gellert Grindelwald
Ezra Miller
as Credence Barebone
Zoë Kravitz
as Leta Lestrange
Katherine Waterston
as Tina Goldstein
Eddie Redmayne
as Newt Scamander
Jude Law
as Albus Dumbledore
Carmen Ejogo
as Seraphina Picquery
Alison Sudol
as Queenie Goldstein
Callum Turner
as Theseus Scamander
Dan Fogler
as Jacob Kowalski
View All

News & Interviews for Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

Critic Reviews for Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

All Critics (268) | Top Critics (34)

About as exciting as a trip to Hogwarts's most neglected lavatory.

Nov 18, 2018 | Full Review…

Dash it all, even the devoted will likely struggle with the reams of expository talk and gobs of unearned feeling and scads of largely pointless beasties, plus some just plain lazy visuals (looking at you, magic cats).

Nov 16, 2018 | Rating: 1/5 | Full Review…

More workmanlike than magical, "Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald" nevertheless feels like an upgrade from its predecessor, one that adds star power, introduces key characters and lays the foundation for a genuine "Wizarding World" franchise.

Nov 16, 2018 | Full Review…
CNN.com
Top Critic

The Crimes of Grindelwald feels hollow and disconnected, like it could have been made by anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of Rowling's wizarding world.

Nov 15, 2018 | Full Review…

Despite being light in the story department, The Crimes of Grindelwald offers plenty of small pleasures and tightens up the linkage between this series and Harry Potter.

Nov 15, 2018 | Rating: 2.5/4 | Full Review…

The "Fantastic Beasts" films have as much to do with the Potter world as the current Detroit Pistons have to do with the championship winning Bad Boys.

Nov 15, 2018 | Rating: C- | Full Review…

Audience Reviews for Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

½

Even though the plot is less cohesive than in the first movie (and Yates's direction more chaotic than it had the right to be), this sequel has urgency and couldn't be more relevant in times when seductive authoritarians incite violence while shifting the blame to the oppressed.

Carlos Magalhães
Carlos Magalhães

Super Reviewer

½

Being a fan of the Harry Potter film franchise for as long as I can remember, I've been looking forward to this expansion of this Wizarding World that has been created by J.K. Rowling. I enjoyed the first film, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, but I was looking for a little more material to latch onto. It felt a little too light on the story the first time around. Sadly, I have to say that Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald does the exact opposite of that, overstuffing storylines that will definitely confuse many average viewers. I understood most of the references throughout the movie, but I believe this an example of an extremely talented writer who's trying to expand her world while also trying to stick to her roots, which may hurt this new franchise as a whole. Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) is hunting for followers, a young Dumbledore (Jude Law) confides in Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne), Credence (Ezra Miller) searches for his belonging in this world, Jacob (Dan Fogler) struggles to fit in, and countless additional storylines all clash together to form the plot of this film. It almost feels like an episode of Game of Thrones, as the movie constantly jumps from location to location, focussing on each of these characters, which didn't really work as a feature film. This movie tries very hard to be a faithful sequel to Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, while also trying to introduce new elements, but also getting caught up in tying into the Harry Potter franchise. It's almost as if J.K. Rowling was worried about not pleasing enough of the fans, so she kept returning to her script and adding more elements for future instalments. This brings me to my biggest complaint. Rowling clearly knows where she wants this story to go, but the fact that this movie is a series of loose ends that are all still left unanswered by the time the credits began to roll was quite frustrating. The worst movies in a series of films are the ones that solely feel like a set-up for future instalments and that's honestly all I felt this film was. We got to know a little more about each of the important characters and then the film ended. Revelations conclude this film and leave you wanting more of certain story arcs, and even though I'll be in the theatre for the next film, based solely on my curiosity, this particular film didn't work very well for me. The story going in so many directions made it a pretty boring experience in my opinion. Eddie Redmayne, Dan Fogler, Katherine Waterston, Alison Sudol, and Ezra Miller all return and work very well in their respective roles, but it truly was the additions of Jude Law and Johnny Depp that stood out to me. Although Depp isn't as revered as he used to be by fans, I thought his performance was very enjoyable. I thoroughly enjoyed Law's portrayal of Albus Dumbledore as well, but there wasn't enough of him. For how much this story ties into his backstory, I figured his screen presence would be much larger. This film advertises itself as an instalment with the majority of it taking place back at Hogwarts, but that's simply not the case. Only when the story demanded it was it to be shown, which was a letdown in my opinion. In the end, the ambitions of J.K. Rowling still leap off the screen and will dazzle many audiences around the world, the score stood out as a highlight to me, and the promising future for this franchise is definitely felt throughout the final moments of this film. That being said, there are too many plot lines to fully enjoy this experience and too many new characters that take away from the story that was set up in the first film. As a standalone movie, it doesn't work at all, but it's a fine watch if your knowledge of every previous film is the first thing on your mind throughout your entire viewing experience. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is a film that promises a lot in the future, but doesn't quite work as its own film. I walked out pretty disappointed, but also hopeful.

KJ Proulx
KJ Proulx

Super Reviewer

I finally figured out what it is that bugs me about this movie, it feels like the movie adaptation of a book I havenâ(TM)t read and probably would need to read in order to understand it. In that way, it almost feels like one of the lesser Potter adaptations. The first Fantastic Beasts was genuinely great, and a solid standalone story. This one is focused more on setting up a franchise, and creating confusing twists that even diehard Potterheads (or perhaps even especially them) will be confused by. Itâ(TM)s not good when after watching a movie, Iâ(TM)m pulling out fan-created family tree diagrams to figure out just how everything connects. Itâ(TM)s also a surprisingly dark film. I donâ(TM)t mean in terms of the tone, though it is that, I just mean the lighting. The opening action sequence I knew we were in trouble. It was genuinely cool, but I could barely see any of it. Howeverâ¦I am going to be an apologist for this movie. Iâ(TM)m sorry, but I still just like this world too much to rag on it completely. I was still engaged throughout, I still liked the world and especially liked seeing wizarding times in the 20s, and I just really love these characters. Eddie Redmayne as Newt is still a delight, Jacob is wonderful, and I was surprisingly okay with Jude Law as hot Dumbledore. Weirdly enough Law actually managed to capture the spirit of book Dumbledore better than any of the previous actors, just in a younger body. As for Johnny Depp, well he didnâ(TM)t leave that much of an impression on me to be honest, which is a little odd for Depp. He was fine, and honestly I kind of liked his portrayal of dark wizard a little more than what we got from Voldemort in the original series (not the character, just the portrayal), but it still felt a little lacking. You can call me a fanboy, but I just love being in this world so much that I didnâ(TM)t really mind all this movies faults as everyone else. The movie has problems to be sure, and I think itâ(TM)s good theyâ(TM)re being addressed so Warner Bros knows they canâ(TM)t just slap Wizarding World on something and have it print money. That being said, the stuff thatâ(TM)s good in here is still deserving of some credit. Redmayne is still charming as hell, the effects are better than ever, and itâ(TM)s still just a magical world to be in. A marginal recommendation yes, but I just canâ(TM)t hate it.

Michael Malan
Michael Malan

Super Reviewer

½

You could argue that a blockbuster movie in the Harry Potter universe taking its time and telling a somewhat complex story of family relations, unknown origins and he hunt for an evil wizard instead of delivering a by the numbers magic show is a good thing. That doesn't change that some parts during the first half of the film are bit hit and miss. The cast is not one of them, it works. Jude Law is a fantastic young Dumbledore, for example. The creatures are great too, making for some of the most wondrous moments, of course. The film shines during its gloomy and exciting finale though and ends with a major plot twists that will have Potter fans discussing until the next part comes out. That's this film's problem, in a few years it will be viewed as merely a transition piece to get to an even bigger film.

Jens S.
Jens S.

Super Reviewer

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

News & Features