Silent Trigger

Critics Consensus

No consensus yet.

Not Yet Available


Total Count: N/A


Audience Score

User Ratings: 1,478
User image

Silent Trigger Photos

Movie Info

In this suspenseful action thriller a hitman's botched assignment leads to a death warrant upon his head.

Watch it now


Critic Reviews for Silent Trigger

All Critics (4) | Fresh (1) | Rotten (3)

  • Silent Trigger is a bland bit of cheapo bullroar that seeks to capitalize on the six people in the world with some excitement left for the next Lundgren miscue.

    Jan 3, 2002 | Rating: 1/4 | Full Review…

Audience Reviews for Silent Trigger

  • Feb 11, 2015
    Judging by this films poster you'd half expect this to be some kind of future set science fiction action fest. Dolph is looking very serious holding a massive hand cannon with a string of massive bullets attached to the couldn't be more badass if you tried! In the background stands the skyscraper where the action is set, again to me this looks highly futuristic and reminds me of the main OCP headquarters building in 'Robocop'. Like most older action flicks the poster is somewhat misleading although not totally. The story does indeed unravel within this huge oddly shaped skyscraper yet its filled with flashbacks to an earlier time. Dolph plays a sniper hitman who is hired by a mysterious agency to assassinate a specific target. His spotter is a sexy female (of course) who just happens to be the same spotter that accompanied him on a previous mission many years before. Together the duo must overcome bad memories and work together to finish the job, unfortunately they also have to content with an unruly drug addicted security guard who gets in the way...kinda. This really is an odd movie, first off the director (Mulcahy of 'Highlander' fame) has clearly tried to mould this into some kind of hi-tech noir thriller. The visuals and lighting within the skyscraper sets are soaked in darkness and very moody, the colour palette mainly consists of dark blue, metallic greys/gunmetal and hints of yellow. This is enforced with the seriously tech-noir style of the interior sets which look really very nice but don't fit this movie premise. In fact the sets looks way too good for such a schlocky action B-movie. The exterior of the skyscraper is very slick and as I've already said very futuristic looking. I did like the strange building design, its very eerie and foreboding with that huge single oval window, especially when set against the night sky. I'm guessing this was a model bluescreened against a real American city skyline, truthfully it does look very well composited and quite realistic. The various skeletal structural sets of the building (both interior and exterior) again I'm guessing were a combination of real worksites and fabricated ones, all in all I was very impressed...didn't expect such glossy sets in this movie. So on one hand you have this very sexy, shiny almost Orwellian cyberpunk looking building that looms over everything where the main duo are holed up waiting for their kill. On the other hand we get flashbacks to their previous mission which appears to be set in some rustic old eastern European town (as always). These flashbacks are a very different style to the films present day, they have a gritty apocalyptic vibe to them that kinda borders on WW1 in places. We are shown how the mission goes wrong and why Dolph doesn't take the shot which of course cues the arrival of faceless bad guys to terminate them. This failed mission does make me wonder why Dolph is still hired by whoever to carry out his present mission. Why does he not still have bounty on his head? or does he? We don't find out who the mysterious agency is that hire him for his current mission and we don't find out who the mysterious agency was that hired him for the failed mission. So we are left in the dark really. Its also kinda mega convenient that the same sexy female spotter is his partner again, makes you wonder that they are both being set up for their previous failure. Well I did until Dolph once again fails to take the shot so a backup team do it for him, so it appears that Dolph puts himself and his spotter back in the shit again. I'm genuinely still not sure if Dolph and co were set up for their previous error or he just froze again and they were attacked for not carrying out their kill, the story isn't that clear. The other odd thing about this movie is the sub-plot involving the deranged security guard based in the skyscraper. This guy starts off perfectly normal but seems to descend into madness after meeting the sexy female spotter when she arrives (posing as some kind of IT technician). There is literately no reason why this dude goes nuts...he just does, the plot required him to do so for thrilling reasons. Just to make sure this character is made out to be a druggie as we see him sniffing it...but that's well after he initially goes all weird. He initially tries to rape the female spotter, fails and goes crazy because...reasons. I still don't get why he actually tries to rape her, does working the night shift in security do this to you? So next to this dark emotional assassination plot there is this oddball sub-plot about a lunatic security guard that Dolph ends up having big fisticuffs literately feels like they just crowbarred it in for a solid fight sequence. The other bizarre thing is showing us Dolph placing small explosive devices in strategic places in the building, mainly the lift. Why would he do that?? he has no reason to think anything will happen in the building, especially the lift. It really does seem to be a very lazy easy way for the main bad guy (plot twist) to get killed off. He just happens to use the lift that Dolph has booby trapped, did Dolph know a top level bad guy would show up and use that lift to escape? apparently he did. Not sure if Dolph was the right person for this role but he does look awesome wielding his ginormous sniper rifle...kinda get the impression that's the only reason he was hired for the role. Gina Bellman is the sultry spotter and she is just that...alluring, seductive, sensual and smokin'. Again I couldn't help but think she doesn't quite click with Dolph, they didn't look right together. A film of two halves is an understatement here, its pretty much two different movies and the half set in the skyscraper is by far the more intriguing. Definitely one of Lundgren's better action flicks seeing as most fall straight into the abyss of oblivion but like I said I think he was miscast here. Lots of sniper porn for gun freaks and an interesting score too I might add.
    Phil H Super Reviewer
  • Oct 15, 2010
    I think this film tried to be deeper than it turned out to be. It was great for some action. It tried to have a lot of suspense, but it didn't execute it as well as it could have.
    Jon L Super Reviewer
  • Aug 27, 2009
    <i>"There's an old saying: just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you."</i> <p> After headlining a string of entertaining, B-grade action spectacles, Dolph Lundgren (<i>Showdown in Little Tokyo</i>, <i>Universal Soldier</i>, <i>Rocky IV</i>) swiftly established himself as one of the industry's most reliable stars for testosterone-soaked actioners. Among his littler-known efforts is the 1996 action-thriller <i>Silent Trigger</i>, which paired the star with Australian director (and B-grade movie extraordinaire) Russell Mulcahy (<i>Highlander</i>). While not exactly the worst creation to feature on the Dolphster's filmography, <i>Silent Trigger</i> is distinctly mediocre. It's a badass, moderately enjoyable 90-minute ride, but Dolph Lundgren is a surprisingly bland protagonist, the whole thing is forgettable, and the script feels regurgitated by a computer. <p> There is not a great deal to be said regarding the plot of <i>Silent Trigger</i>, as it's more of a series of vignettes than anything resembling a solid storyline. Essentially, Dolph's character here is a covert assassin named Waxman who's an expert marksman with a sniper rifle. He suddenly and inexplicably gains a conscience during an assignment, and in doing so condemns himself to death at the hands of his rookie spotter Clegg (Bellman). Years later, Waxman has been tasked with another assignment to be carried out in the upper floors of a half-built high-rise building. To Waxman's surprise, the spotter he has been assigned is Clegg, which leads to a number of battles over trust. The two are also forced to deal with a couple of pesky nightwatchmen, one of whom is an obnoxious, seedy man keen to rape Clegg. <p> Although Sergio Altieri's screenplay appears to be more concerned with rumination than balls-to-the-wall action, <i>Silent Trigger</i> is not a thoughtful blockbuster which successfully provokes ethical or existential questions. It touches upon the moralistic side of being a sniper, granted, but these issues are handled in a naff, inadequate manner. Plus, the flashbacks revealing the morals of an assassin life provide nothing more than an excuse for director Russell Mulcahy to do what he does best: marshal a number of impressive action sequences. On that note, if anyone deserves credit for making <i>Silent Trigger</i> watchable, it's Mulcahy. The stylishly dark tones generate a fair amount of suspense, and the director made the most of the unfinished building where most of the action unfolds. There are technical goofs here and there (in particular some shoddy visual effects work) as well as pacing issues (there are too many dead spots), yet the action is still violent and satisfying enough. <p> Unsurprisingly, characterisation and plot are feeble in this film. High Shakespeare was not expected, but would a little personality in the characters be too much to ask? In addition, there are plot points which simply do not make sense. For instance, why is Waxman still working for the agency after they issued a kill order on him? Why would Waxman agree to another assignment? Why does Waxman show up to the high-rise a full 5 or 6 hours before his target is due to show up? Why engage the nightwatchmen at all? Meanwhile, Dolph Lundgren is predominantly forgettable as Waxman (though his screen presence is tolerable), and Gina Bellman (of <i>Coupling</i> fame) is not overly good in her role as Clegg - she's only memorable due to her good looks rather than the sincerity of her performance. From top to bottom, everything about <i>Silent Trigger</i> reveals its origins as a low-budget straight-to-video action vehicle - especially the cheesy score courtesy of Stefano Mainetti. <p> As far as these kinds of action films go, you could do far worse than <i>Silent Trigger</i>. At the very least, it provides an easy viewing experience with a few worthwhile moments. However, you could also do a whole lot better than <i>Silent Trigger</i>. It's worth watching, but only for Lundgren purists or action enthusiasts who've exhausted their supply of quality actioners. In other words, it pampers to its niche audience, but it's nevertheless very pedestrian. Trust me; you will forget you ever saw the movie about 10 minutes after you finish watching it.
    Cal ( Super Reviewer
  • May 05, 2007
    <div align="justify"><p><b> Actually its a slow Action Movie. Action? I dont know if the word Action is right for this Movie. Its maybe a Thriller. What I loved and can never forget about the Movie ARE the last 15 Minutes. Really Fantastic. Boom Boom Boom. I wont rate it as Adventure. ehh?? Well I love when Lundgren plays Soldier or well a tough Characters. Even when he plays a Priest he is tough. Action where Lundgren appears. Gina Bellman was so Sweet lookin in this Movie. She is such a cool Actress, I like her acting and even her real personality. She is AWESOME. :D</b> AND NOW LILOZ Final thoughts abt Lundgren as Actor. I use to lub this guys acting and hope he goes on making some great Movies, but I think he should take roles which suite him and his age.
    Lilo C Super Reviewer

Silent Trigger Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

News & Features