Sweet Country
2017, Western/History, 1h 53m
93 Reviews 500+ RatingsWhat to know
critics consensus
Sweet Country makes brilliant use of the Australian outback as the setting for a hard-hitting story that satisfies as a character study as well as a sociopolitical statement. Read critic reviews
You might also like
See More


Where to watch
Sweet Country Videos
Sweet Country Photos
Movie Info
Cast & Crew
Sergeant Fletcher
Judge Taylor
Philomac
Nell
Lizzie
Archie
News & Interviews for Sweet Country
Critic Reviews for Sweet Country
Audience Reviews for Sweet Country
-
Jun 27, 2018Sometimes the expression "it's a beautifully shot film" is the kiss of death to me, akin to hearing in high school that a blind date had a great personality. Here that observation is not only not the case but indeed it is the least of it's many attributes, for here is a nuanced piece about, for instance, hatred, that doesn't use a megaphone to make its point. Instead, languid observation serves to reveal (as it should in a visual medium) some of the results of unthinking action. A potent work resonant with both scenic and personal and historic beauty.
-
Jan 31, 2018I went in to Sweet Country completely blind, had no idea what it was about, knew literally nothing beyond Sam Neill being in it, and the fact that it was called "Sweet Country" (good thing too, 'cause the trailer I watched for it a week later spoils literally the most important and final plot point). Sweet Country is a slow-burn venture in the right way, that makes some odd stylistic choices which perhaps would have better served a different sort of movie. A distinctive film for a year that has had a lot of same-same movies.
-
Jan 20, 2018This is one of a long line of Australian films about that country's Indigenous history that are documentary, not only a fictionalised story. Indigenous people made this film and the Indigenous actors here, while their film acting is superbly fluid and transparent, are not just acting. The history of their people is alive in them, as if the voices of the past are speaking now. That is a testament to the Indigenous survival. The influence of Indigenous people on today's Australian culture is such that the white actors' performances ring true with thorough understanding, and the cinema was full of non-Indigenous Australians. The film has the mark of inevitability - everyone is expecting to see these atrocities that happened in the everyday, during the taking of the Australian land mass. For Indigenous people, survival meant living through slavery, crime and betrayal. The predictability of this story underlines artistically what lies in the DNA of the country. Today, many Indigenous people live in third world conditions; nearly all child prisoners in jails are Indigenous. So the film is not surprising, and the audience did not go to see it for that. There is a desire to hear the Indigenous story told by the people themselves. Plus, the Indigenous style of telling is possessed of a great quick wit, a sure dart of communication, that gets you before you know it's coming. This story is told simply, with strong production values. The landscape and the dwellings are unremittingly harsh, with one exception - the stock horses looked like show specimens. Why not get the horses instead from among the thousands in the dogger sales, and give them a future? Otherwise, the film's value lies in its reality and lack of sensationalism: it's not about thrills, but the grind. In the age of gratuitous cinema violence, in contrast there is nothing extraneous here, though there is violence aplenty. Thinking of an outback tour? Make this film a part of your homework.. . Super Reviewer
Movie & TV guides
View AllAbout Tomatometer
Verified