Tape - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Tape Reviews

Page 1 of 26
August 21, 2017
Last half hour made for entertaining viewing but I fast forwarded through the first 45 mins and even fell asleep! Really only gets interesting when Thurman shows up. Up to that point is just a long drawn out lead up to her arrival!
½ October 7, 2016
Linklater at his most amateur state, 'Tape' is more of an example of the direction in which his filmmaking is heading towards. To a critical viewer, it could be very rewarding to learn from the mistakes in building the characters, something which the director has not much of an issue with later. Its also the most cinematic of his films, where the realism of the characters fade away every now and then for rather cheap and meaningless reasons. Still a worthwhile watch of 3 people conversing in one room for 84mins.
½ June 10, 2016
Richard Linklater is recognized for his character studies, and "Tape" has got to be his most twisted and confined.
½ May 27, 2016
If you can handle the arguing in circles and certain character douchebaggery, Tape is an intriguing study of character exhibiting good direction and the on point performances from its three leads.
½ March 18, 2016
I wasn't sure what to expect seeing famous actors with a known director in something that looks like a bad student film. The first half is hard to sit through, not just because of its extremely low budget but because it's two unlikable guys just talking. I'm not quite sure when (the arrival of Thurman helps) but at some point it goes from tedious to riviting.
February 5, 2016
It's too easy for characters in a film to get out of an uncomfortable situation. A substantial number of dramas avoid heavy conflict until it's time for the climax, when gloves have to come off for sake of some sort of conclusion based excitement. It's to be expected and oftentimes rewarding in terms of catharsis, but "Tape" is a special experiment in indie filmmaking because it is an entire movie consisting of that scene. Set in one hotel room and featuring only three actors for its entire length, anything developed is an aftereffect of confrontational conversation, two of the trio of characters dying to be anywhere else. The film reminds one of the naturalistic style of John Cassavetes, being photographed with a cheap camcorder and showcasing three unrefined, unflinchingly, dare I say it, real performances.
And one can't imagine it was an easy production, considering the small size of the central hotel room and the way the cinematography is as visceral as cinematic camerawork can be. We are first greeted by Vince (Ethan Hawke), a small-time drug dealer/volunteer firefighter camped out in a seedy hotel room for his hometown's annual film festival. He has come back to the city in support of his high school buddy, Jon (Robert Sean Leonard), who, making his directorial debut, has won a screening of what he hopes to be a big success of a feature movie. "Tape" gets going when Jon knocks on the door, who expects a brief visit but gets something much more in return.
Vince, cunning and nettlesome, is bothered by something that doesn't involve supporting Jon's professional aspirations in the slightest. What he's bothered by, it seems, is some unsettled drama from the last days of high school: Vince is certain that Jon date-raped his first girlfriend, Amy (Uma Thurman), with whom he never slept with himself. Concerned that the event might have been a trauma Amy never got over, he plans to, without Jon's knowledge, record a confession and hand it over to her, or better, the police.
But because Jon is level-headed and mature in comparison to the squirrelly, cocaine-snorting Vince, we're slightly doubtful of Vince's accusations. So things get even more interesting when Amy herself comes to the hotel room, with a recollection completely different than what we might expect.
"Tape" is only 86 minutes long, takes place in real time, and never changes its environment of drama - if it isn't the very definition of an acting movie, I don't know what is. It is reminiscent especially of 1966's "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?," not for its content but for the way it is filmed without a hint of a stylistic singularity, letting the actors, the increasingly tense nature of the screenplay, jerk our senses around in ways that practically redefine the meaning of entertainment itself. Of course, it is too brief, and too minor when putting the careers of the actors into perspective, to be anything other than a fascinating acting exercise of high merit, but that doesn't make it any less of a vexing experience. It underlines the power of acting, and makes a good case for the brilliance of these three actors, who pull off roles more difficult than anything most mainstream actors would ever have the balls to deliver.
It is also directed by Richard Linklater, whose iconoclastic filmography consists of such classics as "Dazed and Confused," the "Before ...." films, and "Boyhood." But "Tape" is unlike his other projects in that you can't tell that it's made by a big-hearted, humanistic auteur - he lets his actors, not to mention screenwriter Stephen Belber, do the talking, he the glue that pieces everything together. And so "Tape" is a sturdy, involving experiment, taking characteristics of amateur filmmaking and making them something concrete, confessional.
January 15, 2016
A fantastic admirable work, with blistering dialogue and clever cinematography. This is a sure one for the cinephiles.
March 5, 2015
To me, Richard Linklater is a dialogue guru and a master of minimalist storytelling. Tape is a perfect showcase of these two things. Taking place entirely in a sleazy motel room, this simple film is about three characters dealing with an event that happened years earlier during their high school days. Considering how little is actually going on here, it's amazing how entertaining this film is. Yet again, Ethan Hawke is absolutely brilliant in a Linklater collaboration. That team-up has become one of my favorite duos - it's always pure quality. I couldn't help but to be sucked in by the fantastic dialogue that this entire film relies on. It's so realistic and not everyone could pull it off. This is where Linklater really shines. I could have listened to these characters go back and forth for another hour and not be bored with it. For what it is, this is a very impressive film.
March 2, 2015
Engrossing film from start to finish with great performances by Ethan Hawke and Robert Sean Leonard.
½ February 19, 2015
Very under appreciated, one of my favorite Linklater movies.
February 13, 2015
Intensely claustrophobic, it's nothing but talk in one interior!
No one else could have made this! Linklater _/\_
½ January 27, 2015
One hotel room for the whole duration and 3 people (one joins half way through), but compelling human drama from Linkater. This is one of his lesser known works, but deserves more audience.
Super Reviewer
November 27, 2014
"I'm not high and mighty. I'm too high to be high and mighty"

As a companion piece to the marvellous Waking Life, director Richard Linklater delivered this experimental and solid little adaptation of Stephen Belber's stage play. Some may not have even heard of this one, let alone seen it as it's probably one of his most unseen works. As always with Linklater, though, it confirms his place as one of the most original and under appreciated of American filmmakers.

Jon (Robert Sean Leonard) is a local boy who catches a big break as an actor and returns to his home town to attend a film festival where he is appearing in a new movie. At a motel he meets up with Vince (Ethan Hawke), his old high school friend. However, Vince hasn't changed a bit and seems intent on bringing up things from the past which Jon seems happy to let go of. When (Uma Thurman), another friend from school appears, things don't quite add up as their past relationship has more to it than some of them care to admit.

Set entirely within the confines of a small, cheap motel room with bad decor, Linklater's ingenuity is apparent from the offset. He shoots on digital video achieving a true minimalism that fully captures the feel of a stage play. There's no music score or elaborate sound effects, but only the highly charged, back and forth interaction between Hawke and Leonard (reuniting after Dead Poets Society). This might not sound too appealing on the surface but it's entirely effective for the material and the inclusion of an old flame in Thurman, adds a captivating edge to the overall purpose and motivation of the three-dimensional characters.

As a chamber piece, dialogue is the order of the day here and it's sharply written and tensely delivered by all three cast members. Their awkwardness is apparent in their exchanges and they have us constantly wondering who to side with while Linklater utilises his environment to marvellous effect. In such a confined space, his movement with the camera is very impressive and he fully captures the claustrophobia and tension to perfection.

Sometimes Linklater will delver a film that just doesn't receive the recognition it deserves and Tape can certainly be included among these. Criminally overlooked upon it's release (and since) as this is a brilliantly realised adaptation that benefits from strong performances, inventive direction and maintains it's intensity right to the very end.

Mark Walker
½ September 18, 2014
Não há como retirar a Richard Linklater o mérito de ser, a par de Steven Soderbergh, um dos poucos realizadores norte-americanos capazes de alternar entre produções à grande escala e projectos pessoais com uma orientação mais experimental - e isto sem que nenhuma das duas facetas anule a outra por completo. Isso não significa porém que o Linklater indie seja superior só por ser mais aventureiro. "Waking Life" e "Tape", ambos filmes de 2001, são exercícios cheios de boas intenções e vontade de agitar as mentes, mas nenhum convence por completo (sendo que o primeiro é bem mais chato). Em "Tape", Linklater procura transformar em filme uma peça de teatro com um texto dinâmico e complexo, que não nos larga da mão, enquanto não tivermos feito a devida reflexão sobre a culpa e o que separa o sexo de uma violação. Assistir ao ricochete constante, que resulta de um diálogo altamente testosteronizado entre Robert Sean Leonard (actor injustamente chutado para canto) e Ethan Hawke (incapaz de disfarçar algum overacting), é o suficiente para ficarmos agarrados a "Tape" durante uma hora e meia, mas, no final, sobra apenas o vazio próprio de uma gigante discussão que não levou a qualquer conclusão substancial. Não admira, porque Richard Linklater é muito melhor a montar um brainstorm do que a encontrar uma finalização satisfatória para os seus filmes pensativos.
½ September 10, 2014
Had a bit of a slow start, but the acting was good, the concept was interesting, and the script was solid. I liked it.
September 6, 2014
A film for me that at times were impressive and others boring. The main focus is much like a lot of Hitchcock films, the whole storyline is based in one room. The storyline doesn't get anywhere quickly, but when it does it starts to make sense and becomes intriguing. Watchable but missable
Cameron W. Johnson
Super Reviewer
½ April 26, 2014
Oh yeah, creeps, you know that something exciting always happens on a tape of motel activities... probably because not enough people saw this film to break that stereotype. No, the film is adequately engaging, I reckon, but it came out not even a month after "Waking Life", which it followed by only three days as Sundance, and either amount of time is way too brief to take comfort in Richard Linklater's name. I don't think the budget helped the fear, because as much as I joke about how no one saw this film, it didn't even break $500,000, and still made way over its budget, probably because Linklater blew all of his money on "Waking Life". I'd imagine all of that rotoscoping technology and college philosophy textbooks which the script was inspired by weren't cheap, and I don't know what's sadder: the fact that all of that money was kind of a wasted on a mediocre art film, or the fact that Ethan Hawke's, Robert Sean Leonard's and Uma Thurman's fame continued to fade after this production which could still afford them on a $100,000 budget. Well, Leonard was cheap because no one ever really cared too much about him, whereas Hawke and Thurman were cheap because Thurman was married to Hawke at the time, and because Hawke has always been Linklater's boyfriend, so I guess the secret behind saving money on this film revolves around a game of "Six Degrees of Richard Linklater" that, well, I don't really feel like playing, because I'm done with convolution for a while after "Waking Life". You know, while I liked "The Newton Boys", it was commercial something fierce, so I can kind of respect Linklater's going all-out with his 2001 comeback to experimental filmmaking, at least after this film. Yeah, if nothing else, this film is better than "Waking Life", although its predecessor in Linklater's filmography didn't raise too high of a standard, and sure enough, while this film is decent, it can't exactly, if you will, "tape" off its blemishes.

Certainly to save money and ostensibly compliment grounded themes, the film utilizes camcorder filming equipment that Richard Linklater plays with in a manner whose slick style often compensates for amateurish technical shortcomings, which still stand, diluting cinematic immersion value, not quite helped by the intentional claustrophobia and faithfulness of this adaptation of a minimalist play. The drama has primarily been criticized for its often feeling a touch too much like a play, and I subscribe to such criticism, because as much as sharper direction and more subtle acting make Stephen Belber's vision's translation to the silver screen more organic on the whole, the minimalism of the film's environment and the overt snap of the dialogue establish a stagey sense of objectivity in the subjective context of film. The play's feel doesn't work as well as it ought to when applied to film, nor does the play's real-time structure, which leaves plotting unable to break along its path for the sake of development beyond almost forced exposition, or for the sake of a feel for dynamicity, a shortage of which leads to a sense of aimlessness that some may find never dissipates, due to the fact that the narrative itself was never to be all that momentous. More talk than action in a setting that I have, time and again, described as minimalist, this film follows a narrative that was always to be plagued with natural shortcomings, deriving from a lack of dramatic meat and layering that was always to limit potential that, as you can imagine, gradually thins down under the weight of the stagey feel and dragging, often to a bland point. Thriving on immersion value, Richard Linklater's direction discards scoring and theatrical atmospheric bite to make up for a lack of technical and narrative flare, and as much as the film proves to be stylish, well-written and well-acted enough to entertain adequately, there are a number of moments in which the film finally slips into dullness. The film is by no means the bore that was Linklater's other highly experimental dramas, but it isn't all that entertaining, and it can't afford to have such bland spells, as its narrative is thin, and the interpretation of such a narrative is too technically faulty, stagey and aimless to sustain enough of your investment to make the final product all that memorable. However, what the film does right it does mighty well, certainly not to where the final product can stand a chance of transcending underwhelmingess, but nevertheless to where the effort gets by, even with a hint of style.

As I've said, the technical shortcomings of this perhaps intentionally cheap film stand firm, with amateur camcorder equipment that is distancing, but all but compensated for by an unexpectedly sharp sense of style to nifty shots and Sandra Adair's razor-sharp, snappy editing that offers genuine liveliness to neatly contradict minimalism as an important aspect in this film. Of course, just as it's worthy of criticism for thinning narrative meat and reinforcing something of a stagey feel, the minimalism of the film deserves some praise, as the motel setting, in its being tightly spaced and, of course, grounded, carries an immersion value that perhaps wouldn't feel so effective when it does, in fact, feel effective if directorial influence wasn't so thoughtful. I've already covered style, and that's arguably the most prominent strength in Richard Linklater's sparse direction, but not the only one, as Linklater's steady pacing, established through tight and subtly stylized scene structuring, while often a little too steady to sustain entertainment value, expands the feel of length in this film to a slightly more memorable degree, while keeping up some entertainment value through plays upon the snap in scripting and, for that matter, depth to the subject matter. Mind you, this minimalist story concept doesn't carry much meat, but as a study on the reconnection between longtime friends who uncover demons and what they haven't quite aged out of throughout the course of a revelatory evening, this narrative has an intrigue to it that I'm sure worked better on the stage, but still works reasonably well here, thanks to Stephen Belber's script's featuring dialogue that is still too stagey and histrionic for its own good, but thoroughly snappy in a way that is colorful, as well as extensive in a way that breathes as much life as it can into this subject matter. Natural and consequential shortcomings wait around every corner to dilute the life that Belber's script works to sustain, until the final product is rendered hardly all that memorable, but the film could have sunk further if it wasn't for inspiration found in Linklater's and Belber's efforts in crafting an adequately intriguing, deeply intimate character study, which can be made or broken by the cast. To be so cheap, the film is able to afford a trio of pretty talented performers, and they deliver as best they can, with the late-to-arrive Uma Thurman convincing as a respectable woman with certain regrets about as much as the seriously Jim Carrey-looking Robert Sean Leonard does as an intellectual who finds his morality called into question by someone he felt he could trust, while Ethan Hawke stands out in a show-stealing portrayal of a charismatic, but thoroughly flawed and arrogant manchild whose lack of predictability and shakiness in humanity really feeds a sense of mystery that does a lot to drive what intrigue there is to this psychological drama. The performers carry the film, more consistently than the offscreen talent, which is still there, providing enough adequate entertainment value and dramatic intrigue to endear, in spite of limitations that are a touch too difficult to overcome.

In closing, faulty filming quality and a stagey feel to the aimless and often atmospherically bland telling of a story too minimalist to be all that meaty make a rather forgettable drama, but there's enough flare to style, immersion value to the minimalist setting, thoughtfulness to the direction, cleverness to the writing and charisma to Uma Thurman, Robert Sean Leonard and a particularly gripping Ethan Hawke to secure Richard Linklater's "Tape" as an interesting intimate character drama, even though it could never overcome underwhelmingness.

2.5/5 - Fair
½ March 28, 2014
Not bad but gets really dull really fast.
½ February 1, 2014
Very well acted and fascinating film by the maker of Waking Life, one of the most original films I ever saw. This film is very different from Waking Life, and rather remind me of Rashomen in plot--an action from the personal view of three different people, each telling a somewhat different story of an event that could or could not be a rape. But here all the dialogue is intensified by having it all occur in a cheap motel room, giving it a somewhat claustrophobic quality.
January 19, 2014
The direction is all over the place, but it either fades away, or you stop noticing it. Other than that, all I can say is I would give anything to watch the play.
Page 1 of 26