Watch it now

Cimarron Photos

View All Photos (4)

Cast

Richard Dix
as Yancey Cravat

Irene Dunne
as Sabra Cravat

Estelle Taylor
as Dixie Lee

Nance O'Neil
as Felice Venable

William Collier
as The Kid

William Collier Jr.
as The Kid

Roscoe Ates
as Jess Rickey

George E. Stone
as Sol Levy

Robert McWade
as Louie Heffner

Frank Darien
as Mr. Bixby

Edna May Oliver
as Mrs. Tracy Wyatt

Eugene Jackson
as Isaiah

Dolores Brown
as Baby Big Elk `Eldest'

Gloria Vonic
as Baby Big Elk `Youngster'

Otto Hoffman
as Murch Rankin

William Orlamond
as Grat Gotch

Frank Beal
as Louis Venable

Nancy Dover
as Donna Cravat `Eldest'

Helen Parrish
as Donna Cravat `Younger'

Donald Dillaway
as Cim `Eldest'

Junior Johnson
as Cim `Younger'

Douglas Scott
as Cim `Youngest'

Reggie Streeter
as Yancey Jr.

Lois Jane Campbell
as Felice Jr.

Ann Lee
as Aunt Cassandra

Tyrone Brereton
as Dabney Venable

Lillian Lane
as Cousin Bella

Henry Roquemore
as Jonett Goforth

Nell Craig
as Arminta Greenwood

Bob McKenzie
as Pat Leary

Bob Kortman
as Killer

Clara Hunt
as Indian Girl

William Janney
as Worker

Stanley Fields
as Lon Yountis

Dennis O'Keefe
as Extra

Frederick Burt

William P. Burt

Frank O'Connor

View All

Critic Reviews for Cimarron

Audience Reviews for Cimarron

• Oct 21, 2013

  A land rusher and his wife attempt to conquer the West. I think one's judgement of this film rests with one's judgement of its main character. Some may see Yancey Cravat as a just, forward-thinking tough paragon of masculinity. However, I see him as a braggart, demeaning, and ludicrous prick. His heavy-handed treatment of his wife, his version of vigilante "justice," his proselytizing sermons, and his posturing nonsense wear on me to the point where I find it impossible to spend one moment in his presence. He's the type of person who so full of himself that there's nothing left for anyone else. The plot of the film serves Yancey. Each turn of the story is meant to render him more fully masculine and more admirably heroic, but what is left when an audience finds themselves unconvinced of his "awesomeness?" Not a damn thing. Overall, this guy is an asshole, and that makes the film an asshole too.
  Jim H Super Reviewer
• Mar 14, 2011

  Okay, so this film is historically significant since it's the first western to win an Oscar (in general), and also for (somehow) snagging Best Picture. I think this is definitely a case of tastes changing. This was seen as a marvelously lavish and epic film in its time. Now it's a horribly dated, irrelevant and racist mess. I will give it credit for being an interesting look at the values of the society that it was produced in. Aside from that, there's not really much of a reason to see this unless you're an Oscar completist of die hard fan of 30s cinema. The story (based on a historical novel) tells the sotry of a man and wife set against the backdrop of the early history and development of Oklahoma. It should be an adventurous story of progress and adventure but is instead a creaky, scattershot melodrama with racist overtones in its portrayal of ethnic minorities. At the time the film was considered progressive, and no one batted an eye over the content. Yeah...can't say the same for how it fares now. I've seen movies that were far more racist, but thpse also had other aspects that helped me forgive them or at least be more understanding. This film, aside from being lavishly staged, isn't really technically innovative or remarkable. The opening scenes are decent though. At least hte film contains one character who serves as a counterpoint to the dominant views and is sympathetic with or understanding of the minorities. That helps, but it's not enough. It's also boring and unengaging. Well, that pretty much sums this one up. It's not terrible, but there's really isn't a reason to see this beyond what I've previously mentioned.
  Chris W Super Reviewer
• Oct 14, 2010

  Creaky antique that somewhat inexplicably won the second best picture Oscar ever awarded. Taking into account that films had just started to talk perhaps that is part of the reason for the prize going to this exercise in overacted storytelling. Although today the picture is quite racist in the context of the time it might of even been considered progressive. The print is in pretty rough shape and Dix in particular is over the top, to be far most actors of the time hadn't learned yet how to modulate down their performances from the silents. Read the much better book instead.
  jay n Super Reviewer
• Dec 16, 2009

  I really disliked this one. It was a poorly made western film. I disliked the character of Yancey quite a bit. at some points it was downright racist. there is a scene where a gunfight is going on (It's a western after all) and Yancey's black servant goes out to save his kids. the servant gets shot. Yancey then kills all of the "bad guy's" and brings his children home. in the street the camera focuses on Yancey's servant whom in his final moments moans "master Yancey" and is completely ignored and isn't even talked about for the rest of the movie. I did like Irene Dunne's performance though. She did very well. but on the whole this movie really sucked. I wouldn't have given Best Picture to this. I'm not sure yet what I would have given it to though. Final Verdict: it bored me, was racist, and it had a poor plot and only halfway decent acting. I would give it to something else. Not sure what yet though.
  Lord N Super Reviewer

Cimarron Quotes

News & Features