Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
Got more questions about news letters?
Already have an account? Log in here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
We encourage our community to report abusive content and/ or spam. Our team will review flagged items and determine whether or not they meet our community guidelines.
Please choose best explanation for why you are flagging this review.
Thank you for your submission. This post has been submitted for our review.
Sincerely, The Rotten Tomatoes Team
2019; largely lackluster
Unexamined life is not worth living. Plato.
Some healthy food for thought in 10 minute snack size portions.
Word but thought provoking. Should be watched!
It works at moments but some parts were weaker. Cornel West is really good here.
Excellent primer to 'Thinking' . Covers a broad range of real world challenges and provides insight on how to define those in our mental models ...highly recommended watching for anyone interested in learning to think and be curious about the world..
Thought provoking interview of scientists who support: Intelligent Design. Must see!
Interesting movie. Wish they would have interviewed philosophers with a more conservative perspective just for the sake of balance. Although in order to balance out Avital Ronell they would have had to interview Thomas Aquinas himself.
Makes for an intriguing film. At times funny, and at its best, insightful.
With the exception of two segments featuring Cornel West and Michael Hardt, this is a profoundly insipid documentary about the state of academic philosophy today. The "going-for-a-walk" format of each segment is gimmicky, and the "insights" of several interviewees -- notably Peter Singer and Martha Nussbaum -- are shockingly dim. I didn't like Taylor's documentary on Zizek, and this one proves to be just as fawning and banal.