On Her Majesty's Secret Service1969
On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969)
Critic Consensus: George Lazenby's only appearance as 007 is a fine entry in the series, featuring one of the most intriguing Bond girls in Tracy di Vincenzo (Diana Rigg), breathtaking visuals, and some great ski chases.
On Her Majesty's Secret Service Photos
Watch it now
as James Bond
as Tracy Di Vicenzo
as Irma Bunt
as Marc Ange Draco
as Sir Hilary Bray
as Miss Moneypenny
as American Girl
as Scandinavian Girl
as English Girl
as Chinese Girl
as Australian Girl
as Australian Girl
as German Girl
as Italian Girl
as Indian Girl
as Jamaican Girl
as Israeli Girl
as Che Che
as Master Gumpold
as Hall Porter
as Draco's Copter Pilot
as Piz Gloria Attendant
as Blofeld's Driver
as Draco's Driver
as American Casino Guest
as Greek Tycoon
as Chef de Jeu
as Chef de Jeu Huissier
News & Interviews for On Her Majesty's Secret Service
Critic Reviews for On Her Majesty's Secret Service
Film of break-neck physical excitement and stunning visual attractions in which George Lazenby replaced Sean Connery as James Bond.
Director Peter Hunt manages to inject some life into this 1969 exercise with a wonderful ski chase, but otherwise the film is a bore.
The Bond films were bad enough even with the partially ironic performances of Connery.
What are Bond's problems now? They're too numerous, as usual, to hold the constant attention of anyone other than a charter member of Her Majesty's Secret Service.
It offers supremely satisfying versions of all the conventions we expect from the series ... and then it does the one thing you don't expect a James Bond movie to do: It breaks your heart.
Audience Reviews for On Her Majesty's Secret Service
And why am I watching a Bond film that's 48 years old? Because that's how long it took me to admit that Bond could be played by anyone other than Connery. But I was wrong. Car chases, ski chases, beautiful women, and a emotional hook! Better than I could've imagined.
Sean Connery retires from the 007 role and incomes Australian model-turned-actor George Lazenby to fill in his massive shoes. Does he succeed? OHMSS was the first in the franchise to attempt the depiction of a more-vulnerable James Bond and this movie also breaks one of the franchises biggest cliches at this point...James Bond gets married to the Bond girl! This movie has a lot of good things going for it. The cast is very well-rounded. Diana Rigg plays Tracy, daughter of a mobster and the woman that Bond falls in love with, and she is fantastic. Equally fantastic is Telly Savalas, who replaces Donald Plleasence as Bond's arch nemesis Blofeld. I think Savalas is my personal favorite actor to play Blofeld because he feels more like a person that can exist in real life. The ski-chase action set pieces are also a joy to watch and first-time director Peter R. Hunt does a pretty decent job, at times giving the proceedings a very 60's trippy vibe. Not only that, but John Barry offers some of his best music compositions for this entry. It's just a shame about Lazenby though. Lazenby's lack of acting experience really sticks out like a sore thumb and in a way, perfectly demonstrates the fact that playing 007 is not as easy of a feat as one might expect. Despite having a decent chemistry with Rigg, Lazenby's performance just left me cold due to his lack of one-screen presence and it doesn't help that most of his dialogue was awkwardly dubbed in post-production due to his heavy Australian accent. The only time Lazenby displays any sincere acting chops is in the film's heart-breaking ending. Despite Hunt showcasing decent prowess for a first-time director, his weakness lies in filming hand-to-hand fight sequences because the editing gets so choppy and the bizarre camera angles really brings unintentional comedy to some fights scenes. Also this movie was just way too long for me and could have used a better editor at the helm because I found myself bored a few too many times, especially during the drawn-out second act in which James Bond is undercover in Blofeld's lair. In the end, a part of me deeply admires how much this film attempted to shake things up with the franchise but in the end it's unique elements never end up combining into a satisfying whole.
Overlong, choppily edited, helming sloppy action, and a plot that is very preposterous and far too self-aware, "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" is is a very weak entry in the bond canon, although it arguably has some of the best sequecnes. After a string of five very original stories, the fans get this, which completely goes against the personality of it's lead character. George Lazenby is not a terrible actor, but he is a terrible choice for James Bond. The previous films focussed on one Bond girl, when in this film, I swear I counted at least 10. The pacing is ridiculous and the plot sometimes makes no sense. Sure, the filmmakers work with what they had, which was a horrible crew. This film is the epitome of a series low. "On Her majesty's Secret Service" is a serviceable flick for fans, especially for the action, but it is quite the letdown in other regards. I will give it some slight props for their effort though.
On Her Majesty's Secret Service Quotes
|Draco:||<After Bond throws a knife near him and hits his calender on the 12th of the month> But today is the 13th...|
|Draco:||But today is the 13th.|
|James Bond:||I'm superstitious|
|James Bond:||This never happened to the other fellow|
|James Bond:||This never happened to the other fellow.|
|James Bond:||Thank you, Q, but this time I've got the gadgets and I know how to use them.|
|Blofeld:||No no no, Mr. Bond. Respectable baronets from the College of Heralds do "not" seduce female patients in clinics. On the other hand, they do get their professional details... "right". The De Bleauchamps tombs are "not" in the Augsburg Cathedral as you said, but in the Ste. Anna Kirch. Sir Hillary Bray would have known!|
|Blofeld:||No no no, Mr. Bond. Respectable baronets from the College of Heralds do 'not' seduce female patients in clinics. On the other hand, they do get their professional details... 'right'. The De Bleauchamps tombs are 'not' in the Augsburg Cathedral as you said, but in the Ste. Anna Kirch. Sir Hillary Bray would have known!|