The Trigger Effect

The Trigger Effect Photos

View All Photos (13)

Cast & Crew

Kyle MacLachlan
Matthew

Elisabeth Shue
Annie Kay

Dermot Mulroney
Joe

Richard T. Jones
Raymond

Michael Rooker
Gary

Bill Smitrovich
Steph

William Lucking
Pharmacist

Rick Worthy
Johnny

Molly Morgan
Babysitter

Shishir Kurup
Raji

Richard Schiff
Gun Shop Clerk

Gary Bayer
Middle Aged Neighbor

Elizabeth Gandy
Cafe Waitress

David Koepp
Director

James Burke
Writer

David Koepp
Writer

Laurie MacDonald
Executive Producer

Gerald R. Molen
Executive Producer

Walter F. Parkes
Executive Producer

Michael Grillo
Producer

James Newton Howard
Original Music

Newton Thomas Sigel
Cinematography

Jill Savitt
Film Editing

Nancy Nayor
Casting

Howard Cummings
Production Design

Jeff Knipp
Art Director

Larry Dias
Set Decoration

Dana Allyson
Costume Design

Show all Cast & Crew

Audience Reviews for The Trigger Effect

• Apr 26, 2016

  You know, I live in an island (Puerto Rico) where blackouts are an almost daily occurrence. Maybe not so much recently, but the blackouts got really bad here some years ago. There was this really bad hurricane either in 88 (the year I was born) or 89 where my neighborhood was without electricity for ONE WHOLE MONTH. I obviously wasn't a self-aware being back then, but I've still experienced real absurd blackouts. Which is why, to me, this movie is so ridiculously absurd and completely over-the-top. I'm not saying that the movie is bad, it's not actually bad at all. It's decent with a good enough cast to make it watchable, at the very least. I just had a hard time getting into the storyline. The film really has no narrative, it's just the theme of what humanity is capable of when the idea of what they view to be 'civilization' is stripped away. And I wouldn't mind that concept, if the film at least had a story to go along with it, instead of segments (or skits) of humans acting like selfish, reactionary assholes. But there's no real story to speak of. I don't even know what Matt, Annie and Joe's endgame is. Like why did they decide to leave their house to go to Colorado? Who the fuck knows? Why is anything happening in this film? Nobody knows, just because they think it might lead to some interesting moments. That's probably the film's second biggest flaw, the fact that there's no real reason for anything that's happening. The first would be, as mentioned, the fact that the situations they present here are so over-the-top and ridiculous. All films are a work of fiction, that much is obvious, and a lot of them are prone to exaggerations, even biographical films, but there's something just so heavy-handed about the way this film presents its story, its world and its characters that's really off-putting. Again, not that there's anything wrong with telling this type of story, where, supposed, civilized humans act like anything but once they're faced with something they're unfamiliar with, but you don't do it the way this movie did it. And that's a shame because, at least with Matt, Joe and Annie, there's some sort of past there that the movie does play with and it's actually pretty solid. It's sort of bogged down by everything going on around them, but there's something there. I will say, however, that the teasing of sexual tension between Joe and Annie has an unsatisfying conclusion. There was no part of that sentence that I liked writing. But, anyway, they just sort of drop the thing without any confrontation between Annie, Joe and Matt and that was annoying. That was the only part of the film that actually had a semblance of a narrative and they just refused to pay it off. Another element of the film that was flawed. I don't wanna say there was a lot of potential with this movie, it's not like this was as inventive as Scott Pilgrim vs The World, but there's a good enough idea here that they could've made something solid and they just didn't. The lack of a true narrative and motivations for the leads, the over-the-top approach to its story, its unsatisfying conclusion to one of the main elements of the film. All of this really hold the movie back. It's not bad, it's decent at best, it's just that it's obvious that its flaws are more glaringly obvious as opposed to its positive points. I can't recommend based on that, but I guess you could do worse. But that's hardly reason to watch a movie.
  Jesse O Super Reviewer
• Nov 30, 2012

  Not bad but not great. I think that with a stronger director than Koepp, this would really have hit home. These actors can and have risen higher when called to.
  

  John B Super Reviewer
• Aug 30, 2008

  Wow this movie was so poorly done. First off lighting was crap. The dialoge was lacking. There was a poem that was read throughout the movie and as far as im concerned it did nothing for the movie and accomplished no effect. Acting was mediocre. And the comment that I continually said during the movie was "Logically Faulty". There were so many times were what was happening, or what we saw was not logical at all. For example a grocery store was brighter during the blackout than a hospital (in daylight). THe hospital was pitch black. Just poor. Thank god it wasnt that long a movie.
  Sarah . Super Reviewer
• Jan 06, 2008

  An amazing movie, that just has you thinking about certain things. hehe
  Leo L Super Reviewer

Movie & TV guides