The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part
The Walking Dead
Log in with Facebook
Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Already have an account? Log in here
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
No consensus yet.
Tomatometer Not Available...
No consensus yet.
All Critics (17)
| Top Critics (4)
| Fresh (5)
| Rotten (12)
| DVD (1)
Not really scary, although there are some nice creepy visuals here and there.
The Godfather it's not, but this had more vigor and immediacy than either Youth Against Youth or Tetro.
People raised their hands in joy when Coppola announced he was returning to horror after his recent wobbly adventures in the arthouse. They'll be begging him to reconsider - or perhaps just simply to stop - after seeing this.
Easily [Coppola's] silliest work ever.
É lamentável que estas experiências estéticas e narrativas estejam se revelando dignas de um adolescente que não só está segurando uma câmera pela primeira vez como ainda sabe pouquíssimo sobre os gêneros nos quais tenta investir.
'Twixt' is not unwatchable, but it comes close.
Sometimes it's fascinating, but just as often, it's frustrating: It's a film without a net, and it tends to land with a thud.
surreal, phoned in, and hostile toward its audience
As much as the budget appears to have been a constraint on the effects of the film, it shouldn't have affected the acting or coherency of the picture.
Not a very good movie, but a weirdly interesting one for the serious horror fans.
Interesting shotgun blast of ideas and moods, and while it doesn't braid together as evenly as Coppola might've hoped, the picture maintains a full punch of atmosphere, while giving its star something substantial to play.
A heady brew of fever dreams, absurd nightmares, and impotent despair
It is painful to see Coppola indulge himself with this personal nonsense, an incoherent mess that doesn't know if it wants to be an unscary Gothic horror story, an overstylized nightmare or an unfunny comedy. It is only bland, pointless and, even worse, sleep-inducing.
Not sure it entirely works, but I loved the dream sequences and Elle Fanning in this. The ending was flat and I hoped for more, but this kept me entertained and was creepy mostly, so no real complaints.
Francis, I admire you very much, but this movie sucks.
Having crafted such classics as "The Godfather parts I & II", "The Conversation" and "Apocalypse Now", director Francis Ford Coppola was, rightly, considered one the heavyweights of cinema. However, he fell on hard times financially and most of his recent film's have shown a shadow of his former self and have had people scratching their heads as to how someone so prominent could deliver such nonsense.
Hall Baltimore (Val Kilmer) was once a successful writer. His career has nosedived and he struggles to produce the material anymore. He comes to a small town during a book tour, and becomes involved in the murder investigation of a young girl. In a dream, he is approached by writer Edgar Allen Poe (Ben Chaplin) and a youthful ghost named V (Elle Fanning) who is in some way connected to a local murder. Both inform him of the details but the connection to the murder is unclear.
As this film opens we are given a growling narration from Tom Waits about a small American town and an introduction to it's inhabitants and our protagonist. The first thing that strikes you is Coppola's perfectly refined atmosphere and obvious ability in framing a picture. Quite simply, the film is marvellously shot. The angles with the camera are impressively positioned and use of light and colour are sumptuous. At one point he introduces a monochromatic approach that further adds to the creepy ambience. From very early on, Coppola's talent is still apparent but where he struggles, is in a particularly poor script. It comes across as an amateur horror and on this front, you wouldn't think for a second that it was Coppola behind it. However, despite the the bad writing, it's clear that this is a very personal project for the director; the idea originated from a dream he once had, which reflects in the story itself and the actual death of his son (Gian-Carlo Coppola) in a speedboat accident also has a heavy influence. The very premise, consisting of a writer in rapid decline also mirrors the director's similar creative downfall. At one point, our lead character is asked the question "how does it feel to the bargain basement Stephen King?" and that's exactly the feeling that this film gives off - a bargain basement horror. Whether this was Coppola's intention is debatable but it still doesn't forgive the muddled unravelling of the story. All this being said, I still found myself persevering with it.
This left me with very mixed thoughts. One the one hand, it struck me as an absolute low-budget turkey but on the other, it intrigued me enough to keep watching. If anything, just see what path the once great director is now treading.
To look into another of Coppola's recent efforts, my next stop will be his 2009 film "Tetro".
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.