Vampire in Brooklyn - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Vampire in Brooklyn Reviews

Page 1 of 2
January 7, 2005
Never funny enough to pass muster as a comedy and never scary enough (if at all) to make it as a horror movie.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
December 11, 2003
Given the talent involved, it's almost impressive how much of a misfire the film is.
Read More | Original Score: 2/5
February 12, 2003
Oh, Wes, what did we all do to deserve this?
| Original Score: 0/5
February 6, 2003
Is it comedy? Is it horror? Uneven film that never lives up to its potential as either.
| Original Score: 2/5
June 18, 2002
Vampire in Brooklyn is neither funny nor frightening and comes up a tedious middle-road hybrid from veteran scaremeister Wes Craven, who directed.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
June 5, 2002
Essentially little more than a romantic triangle with a 'good versus evil' twist, it's not a bad film, but it is also neither winningly funny enough to exploit Murphy's talents nor bitingly scary enough to exploit Craven's.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
May 14, 2002
The horror relies on special effects so obvious that the scares are compromised.
Read More | Original Score: 41/100
April 12, 2002
Neither as good as it might be nor as bad as you might expect.
January 1, 2000
Doesn't live up to its promise or premise.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
January 1, 2000
To call this a comedy is a sign of optimism; to call it a comeback for Murphy is a sign of blind faith.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
January 1, 2000
Craven can't keep the comic elements in balance with the horror, and as a result there's no tension or dramatic pull.
January 1, 2000
This modern fable is little more than a Murphy potboiler, something to while away a couple of hours, rather than fondly remember.
January 1, 2000
A big, glossy and mostly puerile project bound to please Murphy's fans.
Read More | Original Score: 3/5
January 1, 2000
Kadeem Hardison is the best thing about this film, playing Maximillian's slowly rotting ghoul henchman. However; one has to wonder about a film where Eddie Murphy needs comic relief.
Full Review | Original Score: 0.5/4
January 1, 2000
They're no match, though, for the crushing disappointment of having to watch Murphy on the comic sidelines. It's like going to a Barbra Streisand concert and being asked to listen with her while the rhythm section sings.
Read More | Original Score: 2/4
January 1, 2000
Neither all that scary nor all that hilarious, Vampire in Brooklyn falls directly between the two, into the valley of mediocrity.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
January 1, 2000
Murphy's performance is pretty good most of the way, but he needed a stronger director than horrormeister Wes Craven to keep him in check.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
January 1, 2000
Murphy's pale efforts are enough to make one fondly recall Blacula. Now that was one sucker who knew how to make a film that didn't.
Read More | Original Score: 1.5/4
January 1, 2000
The bottom line is that Vampire in Brooklyn is funny and gross, but saddled with a pedestrian storyline that denies any real magic in its premise and sinks its potential as a dark fantasy.
Full Review | Original Score: C+
January 1, 2000
Lightweight fun.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Page 1 of 2