Mary Poppins Returns
Log in with Facebook
Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Already have an account? Log in here
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
No consensus yet.
No consensus yet.
All Critics (18)
| Top Critics (8)
| Fresh (13)
| Rotten (5)
Thanks to an informative, buoyant tone and the director's own restless intelligence, the film preaches to the unconverted with passion, energy and graphics so clear that they would make Al Gore weep all over his PowerPoint.
A peppy, bouncy documentary that is watchable and informative, although Tickell's celebrity name-dropping at times detracts from the serious message.
It's a slickly enjoyable production (if unfocused and bloated), and his bullet-point tips are persuasive; but dude, there are better ways to humanize these issues than crying on camera.
There's not a single (even moderately) dissenting voice in Fuel; you're either on the biodiesel bandwagon or raping the planet.
One of the refreshing traits of this action-nudging documentary is Tickell's willingness to wrestle his own biases.
Smartly animated interstitials, memorable archival material and a lively soundtrack round out the fast-paced proceedings.
shows the not-so-shocking connections between the auto industry, the oil industry and the government, prescriptively offering alternatives ...
Tickell keeps the film hopping along, far more interested in the positive than a woe-is-us mentality
A good natured cheer-leading session for clean vehicles, "Fuel" is several measures short of the intensity it will take to put Hummers where they belong---in museums.
Another fervent call-to-arms from one side of the aisle.
For a film about energy, it's marvelous that Tickell ultimately gives us all the proverbial power.
Tickell makes his case in an entertaining and hence all the more effective manner.
This thesis-driven documentary makes the case for biofuels as a viable replacement for oil.
On another site, I make the case that conflating our involvement with the Middle East with oil only is a myopic point of view (link at the end of the review), and this is just one of the arguments presented in Fuel that bothered me. Additionally, almost every other argument was a pathos argument that deployed the same overblown sentiment: "What about the children? We're borrowing the environment from our children." In the words of George Carlin, "Fuck the children." Even if you're not angered by the obsession with children that this film deploys, you'd have to admit that the argument loses its effectiveness after it's repeated almost every five minutes. I also wonder if people fifty years from now will look at the scene in which two people drink bio-oil the same way we look at footage of people fifty year ago drinking DDT.
Overall, there is some good information in this film, but the arguments get repetitive and tired.
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.