Bad Santa 2 (2016)
Critic Consensus: Loaded up with the same scatological and misanthropic humor as its predecessor but precious little of its heart or genuine wit, Bad Santa 2 presents a foulmouthed shadow of Christmas past.
Bad Santa 2 Videos
Bad Santa 2 Photos
Watch it now
as Willie Soke
as Sunny Soke
as Thurman Merman
as Regent Hastings
as Jolly Santa
News & Interviews for Bad Santa 2
Critic Reviews for Bad Santa 2
This film is far from perfect, but it made me and some other terribly frightened folks laugh for a while in the dark.
The whole series is based on the notion that no one is any better than his worst impulse.
We have long hoped that there might one day be a sequel. We need to be careful what we wish for.
At its best, Bad Santa 2 feels like an echo of its predecessor. At its worst, it's unfunny, crass, and uncomfortable (not in a good way).
Once-edgy jokes about Santa's vomit-caked beard, his open hostility toward children, and sexual proclivities in line with R. Crumb are now compulsory elements, like Bruce Willis saying "Yippie-ki-yay" in a Die Hard sequel.
Audience Reviews for Bad Santa 2
It seems Hollywood is intent on making pointless remakes and sequels to movies that in way require them. The days of stand alone movies appear to be gone as literally anything can get a sequel no matter what. It doesn't even matter how the original movie ended, they will still try to wangle something out of it. Case in point, 2003 black comedy 'Bad Santa', a devilishly wicked little affair that was somewhat original and gave adults something to giggle over after the kids had gone to bed. Did this movie need a sequel? No, it was a clear stand alone movie, plain and simple, yet here we are. Believe it or not but the plot to this movie once again revolves around our protagonist Willie Soke (Billy Bob Thornton) getting into a Santa outfit, the hell you say. Believe it or not but the plot also requires Willie's old partner in crime, Marcus Skidmore (Tony Cox), to also once again join him as an elf so they can pull off a heist. Said heist simply revolves around trying to rob a charity organisation in Chicago. The only major difference with this movie is they have Willie's mother Sunny (Kathy Bates) to help them. So Willie and Marcus are going to attempt to steal all the loot from within the office of this charity organisation. Obviously in order to get into this office they are gonna need to scout around, get the lay of the land and eventually break in somehow. So what does that mean? why lots and lots of profanity, sexual acts and the usual double crossing of course. Seriously this movie has clearly gone all out to simply be more outrageous and disgusting than the original...for no real reason it seems. I don't have an issue with this if it actually made any real sense to the plot. Take Willie for instance, an alcoholic, malnourished, dirty bum with nothing to his name, yet he still manages to get handjobs from busty blondes and sex from the sexy female charity organiser (the one he's trying to steal from). Like I realise this is a dumb comedy but come on now, why would these women be attracted to this guy when he's made out to be so disgusting. Then you have Marcus, who virtually does nothing for the entire run time other than swear and look sorry for himself. Its bloody obvious this guy is still mad at Willie from the first movie and its bloody obvious he's gonna try and screw Willie over. But this guy has nothing to do here, he's merely there for size and sexual innuendo gags. OK sure he was doing the same shit in the first movie but that was the first movie. In fact I felt sorry for the guy because this time he gets turned down by a curvy lady who ends up fucking Willie! (apparently this guy is some kind of low life, homeless sexual magnet). Thurman Merman is back again too (couldn't leave this guy out) although I don't know why. Much like Marcus he does nothing for the run time (even less than Marcus), he only seems to be here again to offer redemption for Willie's character right at the end. The best thing about this movie has to be Kathy Bates as Willie's old mum Sunny. Now even though this characters inclusion is utterly groan inducing in its lack or originality, predictability and tired old cliches, I can't deny it worked to a degree. Bates fits into this role like a glove, she looks like pure overweight white trash and then some. On the other hand, when she cleans and dresses up to play Santa's wife with Willie for a gig, she looks absolutely perfect for that too. The perfect white haired old granny and the perfect leather clad biker bitch from hell! Bates is clearly having a ball letting loose here and she almost saves the film, if it wasn't for the fact that her character is so damn obvious. [i]'I smoked two packs of menthol a day, washed it down with a layer of this gin, and I could still fill this shot glass with this man's jizz'[/i] This movie is desperately short on plot and way too high on filth, its almost as if they were doing it for shock value. It wouldn't be so bad if any of it were actually amusing but most of it is either outright disgusting or plain childish. Everything and anything you could possibly imagine being seedy is in this movie, having anal sex in a dark dirty alley, your mother talking about all kinds of sexual stuff, masturbation, seeing people on the toilet, slutty girls, drunken brawls, being generally rude about fat people, casual racism, misogyny etc...Even the parts where the plot kicks into gear its incredibly stupid. Like how did they rob that mansion without ever being spotted? And could the finale be anymore flippin' predictable!! All in all this was a major miscalculation if you ask me. Yes its kinda amusing to see a drunk dishevelled Billy Bob Thornton in a Santa outfit giving little kids the beady-eye and a mouthful as they take turns sitting on his knee (easily the best part), but that's literally it. Sure its kinda amusing to see Kathy Bates acting like a cock hungry slut, swearing like a sailor whilst looking like a butch dyke, but it wears thin after the initial laughs. I won't lie and say the sex scenes didn't arouse me slightly (some good fantasy scenes in there). But I also can't deny that in the end this movie did leave me actually feeling dirty, like I needed to have a shower. A case of trying to milk the last drop of money out of a franchise? Or simply giving Thornton some much needed work? Probably both. [i]'Flouting? I never sucked jizz out of nobody's ass!'[/i]
Does this movie win the award for Most Unnecessary Sequel of 2016? Well, actually, I don't really know. I'd have to go back and read all of my reviews for the past year in order to make that decision. But I'll be damned if this wasn't on that list, even if it wasn't the most unnecessary sequel of last year. I honestly wish Flixster would have an option where you go year by year and see the movies you reviewed that particularly year. It'd make doing lists so much easier. Not to mention comparing films, if they need to be compared at least. I'm sure it's not that difficult, but the programmers at Flixster may just be too lazy to do it. Ah, it is what it is. But I digress, I was actually surprised by how bad this movie actually was and how much it actually fails at being an entertaining sequel. Stylistically speaking, this is the same movie as the original. Willie is still an crude, offensive misanthrope who cares little about anyone but himself. The movie is still as raunchy as ever, with sex jokes and foul language up the ass. But, and this is only one of the few problems, the movie just isn't funny. It's just not. I think it tries to use is its crude and offensive sense of humor as proof of 'hey, it's still the same move' when it's really not. Here's the thing, you can attempt to be as offensive or as crude as you want, and I have no problem with that, films should be able to joke about shit that makes us uncomfortable, if only to make us reflect on ourselves and the society we live in. But here's the thing with using offensiveness and crudeness as the basis of your humor, you actually need some fucking jokes. Well-written jokes. Jokes that actually make you laugh instead of roll your eyes. My previous review (of a Netflix Original movie called Mercy) complained about its twist that was done just for the sake of one. Well, that applies to the humor in this movie as well. It's crude and offensive just for the sake of being crude and offensive. Not because they actually have some great jokes up their sleeves where, the only way to get them out, is through that filter. And that annoys me, because I legitimately enjoyed the first Bad Santa. It was a pretty funny movie, that I've been wanting to re-watch. And if this movie is what they had in plan for the sequel, then what was the fucking point of even bothering? Not to mention the fact that it's been almost FOURTEEN years since the original came out. The people who really wanted a sequel to this movie have been waiting for longer for this than those who wanted an Anchorman sequel. Imagine waiting nearly fourteen years for a movie and when it comes out, it's this. Oh boy, I can imagine some people being pissed off. The thing about the original Bad Santa, on top of the fact that it had legitimately funny jokes, is the fact that those jokes had a purpose. They were meant to establish Willie as this unlikable grinch who's selfishness is second only to, well, nothing. But they also paired that with an actual story where Willie sees some growth through his connection with Thurman. I guess you could justify that same approach in this movie by saying that Willie is reconnecting with his mother. And that's fair, I suppose, but it still doesn't make the comedy in this movie any good. Again, they rely way too much on the fact that being crude will net them some laughs, as opposed to using crude humor to tell good jokes. I know I've repeated that a whole fucking lot, but it bears repeating. The humor is just super fucking lazy here. Not to mention the story. There's something here with exploring Willie's relationship with his mother and how he is the way he is because of her. But they don't go to any interesting places with it. It's just the basic 'I was a drunk and I fucked up your childhood' type bullshit. At the very least, this movie does a better job at justifying its existence than Hot Tub Time Machine 2. The latter existed simply because there were a bunch of leftover skits from the original that they wanted to use. Hence they made a sequel that, literally, was a series of skits barely held together by a narrative thread. This movie, at the very least, attempted to have a story, even if it sucked, to hold together its skits. The casting was at least strong. Billy Bob Thornton is perfect in roles like this, so he's no problem. Kathy Bates is always a more than welcome addition, even if they did not give her character much to do. The problems I have are not with the casting, far from it. The cast, I believe, are the only legitimately good thing about the movie. That's it, really. I don't think I can go on with this review any longer. This is a very bad movie that hardcore fans of the original won't enjoy, at least that's how I see it. There's probably a very small group of people that will champion this as superior, but they're empirically wrong. Don't watch, I'm sure the original Bad Santa is available cheap on Amazon. Get that DVD instead of spending your time watching this, you'll thank me later.
A comedy with no reason to exist is a lousy thing and it's even worse when that comedy seems to know it, and thus is the pitiful state of Bad Santa 2, a sequel that feels far too stale. I wonder if the original movie was as enjoyable as I recall or if in the ensuing 13 years we've just become more inured to the casual vulgarity of these movies, but I was left bored by the overwhelming listlessness of this comedy. Billy Bob Thornton returns but he's generally on autopilot. The loose plot involves another score, this time engineered by his mother (Kathy Bates), but really it's mostly a hangout film with nasty characters insulting each other in painfully provocative ways. I was getting restless and the comic set pieces are to a whole poorly developed and routinely settle on the easiest joke, which is again witless shock value. There's no range, no unexpected turns, so much of the comedy falls flat, the same smutty joke repeated with little variance. Stay tuned for a tepid end credits sequence that justifies the "graphic nudity" of the rating (hopefully Snapchat does not get any ideas for the tie-in). Without a stronger plot and characters, the shock value begets diminished returns, and even my preview audience was deadly silent for long stretches. I laughed about ten times total, not enough to justify a theatrical viewing but perhaps enough to keep it on TV while folding laundry. The strange thing about a dark comedy is that it feels like all the consequences from the plot were cut in editing as several storylines and their reasons to exist fail to fully manifest. There are payoffs you anticipate that never come and storylines that seem created entirely for reasons that never arise. The most consistent comic presence is Brett Kelly replaying his now grown-up simpleton from the first movie. Kelly is the only actor who plays a different note, providing a dose of unyielding optimism that befuddles. If you're a big fan of the original and just looking for another fix perhaps Bad Santa 2 will provide enough nasty humor to satisfy. By the end I felt drained from this thoroughly pointless affair. Nate's Grade: C
Bad Santa 2 Quotes
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.
Discuss Bad Santa 2 on our Movie forum!