Da 5 Bloods
On the Record
I May Destroy You
Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
Already have an account? Log in here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
We encourage our community to report abusive content and/ or spam. Our team will review flagged items and determine whether or not they meet our community guidelines.
Please choose best explanation for why you are flagging this review.
Thank you for your submission. This post has been submitted for our review.
Sincerely, The Rotten Tomatoes Team
After glimpsing potential in Rudolph's Trouble In Mind, I gave his adaptation of Vonnegut's 1973 novel a chance. Some nice touches at start which show a reverence for source, but film quickly becomes muddled. For example, in the novel, Celia Hoover is already dead by suicide. In the film, she appears to be only an apparition, but then maybe she really is still alive. Magical realism? Hallucination? Intentional ambiguity? Who knows and who cares? This film sets a manic, disjointed tone from the start and never lets up. Willis is OK as a well-groomed businessmen trying to hide his creeping insanity, and Glenne Headly as his receptionist/lover delivers a nicely restrained performance in what is otherwise an over-the-top ham fest, but a grumbly Albert Finney is miscast as Kilgore Trout and none of the characters exhibit more than a single dimension. The end radically departs from the novel with maudlin additions by the filmmaker. The sentiment fails to connect and almost all the jokes fall flat. Skip Breakfast.
Breakfast of Champions is one of those rare movies where reading the book ahead of time makes the movie more enjoyable.
Without having the context in place, Breakfast of Champions understandably baffles the sort of moviegoer who thinks there's any sanctity in Bruce Willis's repertoire.
This movie was one of the low points in Bruce Willis career without a doubt. This piece of cinema garbage from the guy who did die hard?? wow
The Material is top shelf from a master but the visual execution is messy wich makes it exhausting but always mesmerizing and really worth your time. If not, at least read the book.
I guess reading the actual novel makes y look at this movie differently, it does a good job of
representing the book wich i find great because its not that easy a book to screenplay because of all the refrences to previous books by Vonnegut.
For short not to mis if your a Vonnegut fan
A anos queria ver este filme, quando finalmente consigo assistir, não gostei.
As atuações são fantásticas, mas o roteiro não consegue segurar absolutamente nada. Filmes loucos já vi um monte, fã de David Lynch e Gillian, mas loucura por loucura, faça bem feito, chega a ser tedioso passar mais de 15 minutos acordado vendo este filme. Devo ter assistido em 3 dias no todo. Chato demais.
Disjointed and unbearable!
Completely butchers the book and manages to take the context of the book almost completely out of tone.
Just watched this fiasco; everybody played their parts very well especially Nolte and Finney and Willis played the nut job well enough but I don't think any Kurt Vonnegut fan is going to like this film.
Everyone involved here (the director, the writer, the cast) seems to have been tripping on acid during the making of this. Oddly, it's what's both stupid and slightly appealing about the movie.