Apr 18, 2014
The inspiration sources of <i>Frances Ha</i> are nothing short of honorable: we have the introspective dialogue invasions of Jean Eustache, the energy of the Nouvelle Vague, the nostalgic setting of Woody Allen's <i>Manhattan</i> (1979) and the cinéma vérité style of early John Cassavetes. However, making an amalgamation of all of them and compressing them into 86 minutes seems like a bad idea. Let's dissect these perceived influences one by one:
1) Eustache took <b>more than three full hours</b> to dissect one of the most fascinating trios in cinema history. Similar circumstances and scenarios than those of the characters of <i>Frances Ha</i> surrounded them. Therefore, what made this trio so fascinating was the characters themselves. Their otherwordly capacity to verbalize their inner conflicts and the exteriorization of their actions was what made the film so unique.
2) The Nouvelle Vague movement was a revolutionary cinema trend too rich in features to be described here, but among them, we can find complex character conflicts and an energetic pace that made the personalities of the characters, including their actions and perspectives towards life, correlate with the energy that they seemed to obtain from the vivid life of the city and from the people around them.
3) The black-and-white use in <i>Manhattan</i> attempted to mirror Woody's nostalgic sense towards a city rich in content, social strata, intellectual discussions and ironies. It had elements that referenced popular culture of generations prior to which the film was set.
4) Finally, in 1959, Cassavetes made an extremely underrated, yet undeniably landmark achievement in American moviemaking applying a neorealist tone to the depiction of cultural elements from the perspective of a modern youth, resulting in a collage of their troubles and their eccentricities.
Indeed, <i>Frances Ha</i> attempted to include all of that (it is starting to sound ridiculous, right?), and also maybe to pay proper tributes. Nevertheless, contrasting it with the previous points:
1) Characters are never dissected. We barely care about them.
2) A similar energy is indeed transmitted, and even some comedy touches worth of the Nouvelle Vague were applied. However, the film moved too randomly, and too quickly to pick a grasp out of anything.
3) The film takes place in the modern time. It doesn't coincide with the feelings transmitted with its B&W tone.
4) It's free-spirited, and the characters represents a particular age segment.
But something good had to come out of this mess. Indeed, Frances had all the potential/capacity to become an iconic character meant to remind us of all the 'Anna Karinas' and the 'Corinne Marchands' improvising in the 60s. She didn't, but she's memorable. The style is very appealing, especially to the film buffs that (sadly, just like me) will be immediately making movie references and style connections while analyzing the characters and appreciating the style, which was beautifully shot. To close this paragraph, the topic of a central character having multiple unconcluded roles or activities with its consequential personal life issues is a theme I approve because the ironies involved in such lifestyle are hilarious and, at the same time, worth of reflection.
Conclusions:
- <i>Frances Ha</i> is Noah's lucky strike.
- The film has too many ideas to tell with little vision, and with little budget, resulting in characters that come and go without any of us caring, discussions not sufficiently engaging to be remembered afterwards, and a movie that feels uneventful at the end, despite some charming moments in between.
- The use of black-and-white is not justified, but it was not a detriment to the quality either. It was just "there", making no difference if it had been in color.
- Given the handful of ideas to share, the film had some glimpses of truly smart screenwriting.
Damn, was this difficult...
66/100
Verified