You might also like
See More




Where to watch
Rate And Review

Verified
-
Super Reviewer
Rate this movie
Oof, that was Rotten.
Meh, it passed the time.
It’s good – I’d recommend it.
Awesome!
So Fresh: Absolute Must See!
What did you think of the movie? (optional)
You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.
Super Reviewer
Step 2 of 2
How did you buy your ticket?
Let's get your review verified.
-
Fandango
-
AMCTheatres.com or AMC AppNew
-
Cinemark Coming Soon
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
-
Regal Coming Soon
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
-
Theater box office or somewhere else
By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.
You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.
Super Reviewer
Rate this movie
Oof, that was Rotten.
Meh, it passed the time.
It’s good – I’d recommend it.
Awesome!
So Fresh: Absolute Must See!
What did you think of the movie? (optional)
How did you buy your ticket?
-
Fandango
-
AMCTheatres.com or AMC AppNew
-
Cinemark Coming Soon
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
-
Regal Coming Soon
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
-
Theater box office or somewhere else
By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.
You haven’t finished your review yet, want to submit as-is?
You can always edit your review after.
Are you sure?
Verified reviews are considered more trustworthy by fellow moviegoers.
Want to submit changes to your review before closing?
Done Already? A few more words can help others decide if it's worth watching
They won't be able to see your review if you only submit your rating.
Done Already? A few more words can help others decide if it's worth watching
They won't be able to see your review if you only submit your rating.
The image is an example of a ticket confirmation email that AMC sent you when you purchased your ticket. Your Ticket Confirmation # is located under the header in your email that reads "Your Ticket Reservation Details". Just below that it reads "Ticket Confirmation#:" followed by a 10-digit number. This 10-digit number is your confirmation number.
Your AMC Ticket Confirmation# can be found in your order confirmation email.
Under Capricorn Photos
Movie Info
A lady (Ingrid Bergman) marries an upstart (Joseph Cotten) and turns alcoholic in 1830s Australia.
-
Genre: Drama
-
Original Language: English
-
Director: Alfred Hitchcock
-
Producer: Sidney Bernstein, Alfred Hitchcock
-
Writer: John Colton, Margaret Linden, Helen Simpson, Hume Cronyn, James Bridie
-
Release Date (Theaters): wide
-
Release Date (Streaming):
-
Runtime:
-
Distributor: VidAmerica, Warner Bros.
-
Production Co: Transatlantic Pictures, Warner Bros.
-
Sound Mix: Mono
Cast & Crew

Ingrid Bergman
Lady Henrietta Flusky

Joseph Cotten
Sam Flusky

Michael Wilding
Hon. Charles Adare

Margaret Leighton
Milly

Cecil Parker
The Governor

Denis O'Dea
Mr. Corrigan

Jack Watling
Winter

Harcourt Williams
The Coachman

John Ruddock
Mr. Potter

Ronald Adam
Mr. Riggs

Francis De Wolff
Major Wilkins

G.H. Mulcaster
Dr. Macallister

Olive Sloane
Sal

Alfred Hitchcock
Director

John Colton
Writer

Margaret Linden
Writer

Helen Simpson
Writer

Hume Cronyn
Writer

James Bridie
Writer

Sidney Bernstein
Producer

Alfred Hitchcock
Producer

Richard Addinsell
Original Music

Jack Cardiff
Cinematographer

Bert Bates
Film Editing
Critic Reviews for Under Capricorn
Audience Reviews for Under Capricorn
-
Sep 27, 2011A melodrama with a few beautiful moments and interesting characters. Also, some nice long shots allow the performances to shine. It does not, however, has a clear focus and that makes it suffer a bit.
-
Aug 13, 2011Um dos filmes mais incomuns de Hitchcock por não se tratar de um suspense tradicional e sim um drama de época. Infelizmente, também é uma de suas produções menos atraentes. Baseado em um romance escrito por Helen Simpson, a história se desenrola na Austrália colonial de 1831. Em uma atuação que traz ecos de seu papel oscarizado em À Meia Luz, Ingrid Bergman é Lady Henrietta, a perturbada e alcoolizada esposa de um próspero ex-condenado irlandês (o sempre versátil Joseph Cotten) com má fama entre a elite australiana. O conflito se desenrola a partir da tentativa do sobrinho do governador (Michael Wilding) de ajudar a sofrida mulher a se livrar de seus tormentos do passado. O melodrama é uma escolha fora do usual para Hitch e, apesar da inserção de seus usuais elementos de suspense, as revelações que esses acarretam não deixam de atuar como um anticlímax (o mesmo pode ser dito do filme como um todo). Sob o Signo de Capricórnio deu continuação aos experimentos com longos planos sequência iniciados com Festim Diabólico no ano anterior. Embora a fluidez com que Hitchcock mova sua câmera seja uma arte a parte (e belamente colocada em prática na cena bravura em que Bergman faz uma confissão sobre seu passado), é possível imaginar o quanto a narrativa letárgica teria se beneficiado da característica edição hitchcockiana. Em contrapartida, o diretor já mostra domínio sobre o uso da cor (este foi apenas seu segundo filme em Technicolor) para afetar emocionalmente o espectador e contribuir para a narrativa. Apesar de a produção ter sido um veículo para Ingrid Bergman, a estrela sueca é desbancada pelo desempenho restringido de Margaret Leighton como a inescrupulosa governanta Milly. Remetendo à Mrs. Danvers de Rebecca: A Mulher Inesquecível com sua paixão reprimida pelo seu mestre, a personagem pertence ao panteão dos grandes vilões de Hitchcock.
-
May 08, 2011Any Hitchcock film has interesting things in but this somewhat overheated soap opera isn't one of his best. Would have benefited from being between 15 to 20 minutes shorter.
-
Sep 05, 2010This is one of Hitchcock's lesser films, it's nothing like his others, and not in a good way. It's a melodrama set in the past. The only good thing I can say is that the cast is good.
Verified