L.A. Confidential - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

L.A. Confidential Reviews

Page 1 of 321
April 16, 2017
L.A. Confidential has a complicated and interwoven plot. Crowe and Pearce's stories are the most interesting, and arrives in a satisfying conclusion.
March 23, 2017
My favorite movie for SO many reasons. Always the right thing to watch in any situation.
March 15, 2017
It's a movie that is a very original entry in the genre of mystery crime dramas. I enjoyed this movie almost all the way through. It took a little while to get going but the characters are established in an effective way. I also thought the mystery element of the movie was handled well and I wasn't able to figure it out until the reveal near the end. I think it is a well-made movie that will make you think and is full of dramatic and action-packed moments. I think fans of this genre will find plenty to enjoy here.
½ March 7, 2017
The pacing can sometimes slow to a crawl, but when it gets good, it gets GOOD! B
½ February 24, 2017
A juicy and entertaining little noir that somehow manages to never putter or trip up.
February 22, 2017
Two years after delivering us the great The Usual Suspects (1995), Kevin Spacey goes on this other epic crime adventure, with the help of impressive actors, Guy Pearce and Russel Crow. L.A Confidential is a wise movie, with even some suspenseful moments, which is more common in horror movies than serious crime movies, some entertaining gun fights and bloody scenes, and the 1950's settings was a terrific choice, it sets the mood just right. Recommended !!
February 19, 2017
L.A. Confidential is a prime example of a crime movie. It manages to keep keep a long storyline exciting throughout the whole movie and bring across an atmosphere the viewer can really feel himself into. Enemies become friends and friends become enemies, but L.A. Confidential extends imaginations of a corrupt political system to new dimensions. When the pursuit for justice becomes self defense or even revenge, L.A. Confidential is just getting started.
February 7, 2017
Based on the novel of the same name by James Ellroy. A strong, well made, well cast, American crime drama set in the 1950s. Guy Pearce, Russell Crowe, James Cromwell, Kevin Spacey, and Kim Basinger all help to make this film memorable.
½ January 28, 2017
L.A. Confidential (1997) C-138m. ??? 1/2 D: Curtis Hanson. Kevin Spacey, Russell Crowe, Guy Pearce, James Cromwell, Kim Basinger, Danny DeVito. Masterful examination of corruption among Los Angeles police department in the 1950s. Spacey is grimy police officer working for sleazy tabloid. Crowe is brutal cop. Pierce is his alter ego, playing a straight policeman. They all get involved in an investigation of a series of murders. Hanson perfectly brings to life 1950s L.A. to vivid life, and his actors couldn't be better. Brian Helgeland and Hanson scripted from James Ellroy's novel (they both won Oscars). Basinger also won supporting actress Oscar in beautifully made film. Off the Record, on the QT, and Very Hush Hush!
January 13, 2017
1928 Was 69 Years Old In 1997.
January 2, 2017
L.A. Confidential is a complex, absorbing noir led by a trio of captivating performances from Kevin Spacey, Russel Crowe, and Guy Pierce.
January 2, 2017
It's good movie to watch
December 25, 2016
What I got to say about "L.A. Confidential" is that it's the massively memorable crime drama/thriller of the year of 1997. "It's very engaging, entertaining, unpredictable and a total knockout." The performances by the cast is well acted. "This ensemble cast give award winning performances in this film!" The directing by the late Curtis Hanson is very well directed. The screenplay by Brian Helgeland and also co-written by the late Curtis Hanson is flawless. The cinematography and choreography is great. The score by Jerry Goldsmith is good. Finally, the effects are good as well. "I have to report that "L.A. Confidential" is a unmissable. - An instant classic movie!"
½ December 13, 2016
This new-noir crime film contains many well-known actors. It is a well-paced story, with a few twists and turns along the way. I thought that there were a few scenes towards the end which didn't quite fit, but overall this is an enjoyable and well-acted film. AAN 1001
Super Reviewer
December 11, 2016
Top notch film-making from first to last as three cops work to unravel a bloody crime spree that even leaves dead policemen in it's wake. The cast is glad to be here and are in for the action although Mr.R.Crowe manages to steal most of the limelight.
½ November 26, 2016
As good as an LA crime drama can get. Once it starts it never stops.
Nate Z.
Super Reviewer
November 24, 2016
There was no stopping Titanic in 1997, iceberg be damned. James Cameron's epic disaster movie had all the momentum of the times, and yet it's a smaller movie that captured more of the critics and was far more deserving of the ultimate Oscar prizes that year. L.A. Confidential was based upon a James Ellroy novel that many argued was unfilmable. Enter journeyman director Curtis Hanson and novice screenwriter Brian Helgeland, and the pair stripped the book down from eight main characters to three, kept the spirit and essence of the book alive while rearranging the storylines for large-scale popcorn thrills. It's been nearly twenty years since L.A. Confidential first seduced big screen audiences and its powers are still as alluring to this day. It's a neo noir masterpiece.

In 1950s Los Angeles, not all is what it seems. The captain of the police, Dudley Smith (James Cromwell), is looking to keep the peace in the City of Angels as outside criminal elements are looking to fill the void from Mickey Cohen going to prison. Three police officers of very different stripes find themselves on the edges of a complicated murder case stemming from a massacre at the Nite Owl cafe. Ed Exley (Guy Pearce) is the son of a famous police captain and wants to rise up the ranks as quickly as possible. He's a political animal and unafraid of ruffling feathers. Bud White (Russell Crowe) is a bruiser of a man who enforces his own level of justice when it comes to men who beat or harass women. Jack Vincennes (Kevin Spacey) is a happily shady officer who serves as a consultant for a hit TV police procedural. The Night Owl case takes them into many sordid corridors of sex, money, and power, including Lynn Bracken (Kim Basinger), part of Pierce Pratchett's (David Strathairn) stable of prostitutes meant to look like movie stars, the mysterious self-serving sources to tabloid journalist Sid Hudgens (Danny DeVito), and good cops and bad cops on the controversial L.A. police force.

This movie is a master class in plotting and structure, enough that it should be taught in film schools. By nature noir plots are meant to be busy and mysterious, and a guarantee for mystery is a Byzantine plot full of plenty of suspects, dispirit elements, and strange coincidences that eventually coalesce into a larger picture. The beauty of what Hanson and Helgeland have done is that they have made the script complex yet accessible, able to lose one's self in the tangled web of intrigue but still able to see how all the myriad pieces fit perfectly together by the conclusion. There is an efficiency to the screenwriting that is mesmerizing. It all seems so effortless when you're with storytellers this gifted or who have a divine connection to the source material. Forgoing the customary slow builds of recent film noir like the oft-cited Chinatown, L.A. Confidential just moves from the opening narration. Within the first 25 minutes, the movie has expertly set up all three of its main characters, what defines them, their separate goals, the obstacles in place, and previews how they will intersect into one another's orbit, and then the Nite Owl case explodes. Every scene drives this narrative forward. Every scene reveals a little more depth to our characters or fleshes out a superb supporting cast. Every scene cements that contradictory theme of the glitzy allure and unseemly darkness of the post-war City of Angels. My only quibble is that before the truncated third act the movie resorts to a few easy shortcuts but by that point Hanson and Helgeland had more than earned their paces. This is one of the greatest modern screenplays, period (WGA listed it as #60 all-time).

There are so many remarkably assured sequences but I want to emphasize one in particular - Exley's interrogation of the three Nite Owl suspects. "Oh I'll break him," Exley promises his superior before entering into the first interrogation room. At first you're with the other officers and morbidly curious with his arrogance. By the end, your jaw hangs in amazement at the intuitive pressure this man is expertly applying. It's a terrific moment that allows Exley to masterfully manipulate three different men, taking pieces and running toward accurate insinuations, building momentum and clarity. Each man is different and each man offers a new piece of the overall puzzle. A slight reference by one unlocks another's confession. An overheard sound byte pushes another into self-defense. I'm convinced it was this scene that ensured robust and thorough interrogation was a crucial element of the gameplay for the 2011 video game L.A. Noire, a noble misfire that definitely looked to replicate Hanson's film as a user experience.

Noir is one film genre with a visual code that can get the best of directors, but Hanson played this to his advantage. Classic noir is filled with criminal activity and the allure of sex and violence, typified perhaps best in the position of the untrustworthy but oh-so-sexy femme fatale. Yet the majority of film noir was produced in an era of censorship thanks to the implementation of the notorious Hayes Code, making sure that audiences didn't enjoy the sordid elements too far. Free of these restrictions, some modern filmmakers take the opportunity to revisit the noir landscape and fill in the blanks of old, furnishing an outpouring of unrestrained exploitation elements. Brian DePalma's 2006 film The Black Dahlia (also based on an Ellroy novel) gets drunk on this mission, though "restrained" has never been a word I would associate with DePalma's filmmaking anyway. My point, dear reader, is that it's easy to get lost in the superficial trappings of the genre: sexy dames, corrupt lawmen, temptation, shootouts, schemes, and chiaroscuro lighting. It's easy to dabble in these elements because they're so nostalgic and celebrated.

Hanson did something different with his 1997 masterpiece. He builds upon the audience expectations with noir but he doesn't let his complex story and characters come second to the visual spectacle of the famous genre. L.A. Confidential is in many ways a movie that straddles lines; old and new, indie and Hollywood classicism, and film noir and drama. It's an adult film that doesn't downplay its darkness, brutality, and moral ambiguity, yet when it comes to those exploitation elements, especially sex, it's almost chaste. The relationship between Lynn and Bud seems refreshingly square, like it was pulled from Old Hollywood. The entire movie feels that way, an artifact that could exist any decade.

Hanson was something of a journeyman for most of his career, directing competent thrillers like The Hand That Rocks the Cradle and The River Wild. As Variety film critic Owen Gleiberman wrote in his eulogy for Hanson (he died in September 2016, a fact I shamefully didn't know until writing this review), after 25 years in the industry the man became an earth-rattling auteur after the age of 50. That is a rarity. Who knew the guy had something this singularly brilliant within his grasp his entire career? The care he puts into the screen is evident from the opening montage onward. There's an elusive magic to the filmmaking on display, a bracingly divine sense of how to move the camera for best effect, how to escalate and deescalate audience nerves. He knows his story structure and characters inside and out, but he also knows how to play an audience. His time making serviceable studio thrillers certainly helps him during the film's climax, a bloody shootout that's also a mini-siege thriller.

Hanson also assembled an incredible crew to enable his vision. The technical elements recreate the early 1950s L.A. time period with beguiling immediacy; the cinematography by Dante Spinotti (Heat) gives a sense of the darker elements just under the surface without having to overly rely upon the film language of staid noir visuals. Peter Honess' sharp editing provides a downright Thelma Schoonmaker-esque musical orchestration to the proceedings, especially as the multiple storylines and developments spill onto one another. Speaking of music, the score by Jerry Goldsmith (Star Trek) is thick with the jazzy overtones of the genre. It's a score that simmers with sexual tension and malevolence. The casting director deserves a lifetime free pass. There are a whopping 80 speaking parts in the movie, and each person is a great hire that builds a richer film.

While the plot of L.A. Confidential sucks you in right away, its characters take hold the strongest. Film noir is one genre that has a codified cheat sheet of character archetypes, and this movie fulfills and subverts them, finding surprising and gratifying ways to further round out these figures into complex and nuanced human beings. The three main characters all provide a different approach to law enforcement and when we see them start to work together it's a wholly wonderful turn of events. Bud is the muscle, Exley is the brain, and Vincennes is the charm, and each one attacks the Nite Owl case and its subsequent leads from different angles that best apply to their set of skills. Each of the three characters discovers new pieces of evidence, new contacts and suspects, and when they start to work together it not only provides a payoff with the combined evidence but with the satisfying nature of their teamwork. That's because they become better people when they work together and each moves closer to some moral redemption.

Bud is the loyal cop with a hair trigger and a penchant for being a white knight to abused women. His personal history of abuse makes him seek justice, often by his own fists. He has a rigid moral code of right and wrong and isn't afraid to cross lines to achieve it. He's also tired of being a bully and wants to be more than just the muscle. Exley is a straight arrow with a strong sense of moral righteousness and a mind for politics. He knows how to play sides for his own gain. He's not afraid of making enemies within the department, and his opportunistic choices create many. He's trying to forge his own path outside the shadow of his father, a famous lawman who was gunned down by a random purse-snatcher ("Rollo Tamassi"). He has to learn that he can't do everything on his own. Finally, Vincennes is in many ways the face of the department as an ambassador to the world of TV and film. He's succumbed fully to the glamour of Hollywood but he's also full of profound self-loathing, trying to count how many compromises he's made in life and where it's gotten him. The appeal of the old life is crumbling and his detective instincts are reawakened, spurring Vincennes into the fray and surprising even himself. It's extremely rare for any movie to successfully develop more than one protagonist, let alone three, and yet L.A. Confidential achieves this milestone so that when we alternate perspectives there isn't a drop in viewer interest. Each man brings something different and interesting, each man reveals new hidden depths, and each character is fascinating to watch in this setting.

The gifted actors take the already excellent written material and elevate it even further, turning an already sterling movie into one of the all-time greats. Almost twenty years later, it's fun to see these famous actors when they were young and, arguably, in their prime. Spacey (House of Cards) was on a tear at this point in his career, between his two well-deserved Oscar wins, and having the time of his life in every role. His character seemingly has the least complexity, a man who knows he's sold out but believes himself to be enjoying the ride, but Spacey offers poignant glimpses of the man behind all that oily charm and sly glances. There's a scene where he stumbles across a mistake of his making and the subtle, haunted expression playing across his face is amazing. The man was capable of expressing so much, and still is. Crowe was still a couple years from his big breakout in 2000's Gladiator but he put himself on the Hollywood map as Bud White. He's a coil of anger and pain looking for an outlet, and Crowe is magnetic as hell. His glowers could burn right through you. Pearce (Memento) was another knockout that solidified leading man status thanks to his performance as the rigidly self-righteous Exley. He's a character that thinks he's above moral reproach, and his humbling is a necessary part of solving the case. Exley is constantly surprising his peers and it feels like Pearce does the same, showing exciting new capabilities from scene to scene, from his stirring hire-wire act with the interrogation scene to his understated glimmer of fear through a poker face. These three performances are golden.

Nobody better represents sleaze than Danny DeVito's character and the man brings a merry lechery to his tabloid journalist/exposition device. His unquenchable thirst for the worst in humanity to sell more papers feels even more sadly relevant given the media climate that contributed to the recent presidential election. Kim Basinger (Batman) won an Oscar for her somber performance, which reinvigorated her career. She's good but I can't help but feel that she won the Oscar in a weak field (my choice would be Julianne Moore for Boogie Nights). David Strathairn (Good Night, and Good Luck) is enjoyably nonplussed as a man who specializes in delivering vice. James Cromwell used every bit of audience warmth associated as the loveable farmer from Babe and used that to his advantage. His pragmatic police captain is a father figure for Exley and the audience and perfectly sets up a turn that leaves the audience spinning even twenty years later.

There are little details the could go unnoticed but confirm for me just how much thought was put into L.A. Confidential. Exley is chided by his superiors for wearing glasses as they think it makes him look weak. As the film develops and he gets more immersed in the Nite Owl case, his compulsions against violence and rash judgment start to waver about the same time he stops wearing his glasses, a subtle symbol of his difficulty to see things for what they truly are. I enjoyed that our introduction to Lynn is in a liquor store and she's wearing a winter cloak that strongly resembles a nun's habit. It's a memorable costuming choice and also suggest Lynn's penchant for straddling the line of devotion. The Patchett "whatever your heart desires" line of high-class prostitutes has allusions to our current media culture of celebrity worship and personalized sexual fantasies. It naturally ties into the exploitation of the dream factory of Hollywood that takes young ingénues with dreams in their head and squashes them pitilessly. It's not the first film to explore the darker side of the film industry but that doesn't make its themes lesser.

L.A. Confidential feels like the noir thrillers of old but stripped down to its essentials and given a new engine. It's something that celebrates noir thrillers of old and Old Hollywood but it isn't so lavish to either the genre or older time period that it loses sight of its own storytelling goals. The elaborate plot is complex and intensely engaging while still being accessible, populated with memorable and incredibly well developed characters, each given their own purpose and own insights that contribute to the larger whole. Hanson's lasting accomplishment is a near-perfect masterpiece to the power of story structure and characterization. The three lead detectives are compelling on their own terms and the movie keeps them separate long enough that when they do come together it feels like a payoff all its own. Hanson recreates the world of classic film noir and makes it his own, using new Hollywood to lovingly recreate Old Hollywood. It's the kind of movie I can watch again and again and discover new depths. It gave way to a wave of success for its participants. Hanson never quite delivered another movie on the level of L.A. Confidential, though I'll posit that In Her Shoes is an underrated character piece. Helgeland has become a go-to screenwriter for many projects low (The Postman) and high (Mystic River) and became a director for A Knight's Tale and 42. It's a movie that plays just as strongly today as it did almost twenty years ago, and that's the mesmerizing power of great storytelling and acting. L.A. Confidential is a lasting achievement that proves once more the power of our darker impulses. It's stylish, seductive, smart, subversive, and everything you could ask for in a movie.

Nate's Grade: A
November 19, 2016
More than just a murder mystery movie with a wonderful cast, this film shines in a way I haven't seen in quite some time. I watched it because of its similarities to a newer movie I had my eyes on "The Nice Guys", and while that film is good, this one takes the cake. The perfectly capture that old school Film Noir feel, without being beholden to the time period. If it wasn't for some of the set details and props, this could be a movie set in 1997. Its based on a series of novels and never got a sequel. It is almost unlike anything else I've seen recently, as far as successful cop movies go. No stories in the 2010's have as much mystery and suspense in them.

Of course there is corruption in the police force and one of our main characters is out to wade through all of that regardless of the consequences. The ensemble cast does a bang up job, with the new comers (at the time) Pierce and Crowe carrying this movie brilliantly and Kevin Spacey + Kim Basinger doing great work as well. Kim won an Oscar for her performance. The eventual three-way romance was a little forced but this movie had a ton of things to do in 2 hours. How could one forget Danny Devito? Playing a sleazy tabloid journalist, who still brings his brand of gravel voiced humor to this relatively serious role.

LA Confidential had over 80 speaking roles and balances them well, with characters leaving their mark and eventually coming back up as a point of reference, moving the story forward. There were also many different plot threads that do not get too convoluted as the story goes, which is a problem with many films today. The mystery keeps you hanging on and an hour in you are still curious to who the antagonist is. But when you find out, you are then stuck with wondering how they would ever take them down. The characters are flawed, real humans with motivations that many other cop movies have, but acted to perfection.
November 12, 2016
Age or repeat viewings don't dull the impact of this movie. If anything it gets better. Absolute classic.
½ November 8, 2016
Pulplier than when pulp went to pulptown, only higher class. A modern noir (not neo, since it's really too similar to the original noir films), it's a textbook in how to make a movie's visuals enhance the tone. Intense and bright, often simultaneously, it's violence is consistently surprising as it explores the moral ambiguity of justice with huge side of bubblegum. Like a season of golden-era TV shoved into 2.5 hours, its unwieldy, engaging, and fun.
Page 1 of 321